# 37 206-212 View full article

УДК 001.895:338.45

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2026-3-37

Kyzym Mykola,
Doctor of Economics, Professor, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Chief Researcher
Research Center for Industrial Problems of Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8948-2656
Khaustova Viktoriia,
Doctor of Economics, Professor, Director
Research Center for Industrial Problems of Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5895-9287

JEL classification: O32; O33; O38; L52

The ability to transform research results into serially manufactured industrial products is a key characteristic of an economy’s technological sovereignty. The most widely used indicator of development maturity in global practice—the Technology Readiness Level (TRL)—only assesses whether the scientific and technological principle underlying a technology has been demonstrated, and does not characterize its capacity for serial production, integration into a target system, or market availability. The article aims to systematize the complete four-dimensional readiness chain TRL–MRL–IRL–CRL as a unified diagnostic tool, establish a formal consistency rule among its components, and develop a quantitative framework for rapid diagnostics. The methodological basis of the study comprises a systems approach and the methods of analysis, synthesis, scientific generalization, comparison, and matrix modeling. For each scale, its definition, level structure, and theoretical origins in the international literature are presented. The monotonicity rule TRL ≥ MRL ≥ IRL ≥ CRL is substantiated, and three “valleys of death” – TRL→MRL, MRL→IRL, and IRL→CRL – are formulated on this basis as operational forms of the structural gap in the industrial system. A quantitative TRL×MRL → (CRL; IRL) readiness matrix is developed, providing a substantive interpretation of nine states, along with a classification of eight development-readiness zones and management recommendations for each group of zones. A differentiated methodology for the multilevel aggregation of readiness indicators from the enterprise to the sectoral and national levels is proposed, accounting for the distinct economic meaning of each scale and introducing a strategic multiplier for defense-critical enterprises. The chain is aligned with the K0–K4 contour model and the typology of research, technology, and industrial parks. Future research is expected to focus on developing sector-specific modifications of the matrix for industries with different commercialization pathways, as well as empirically validating the proposed readiness ranges using a sample of Ukrainian high-tech enterprises.

Keywords: innovation activity; commercialization of R&D results; technology readiness; manufacturing readiness; integration readiness; commercial readiness; valley of death; technology transfer; structural gap; industrial system; industrial policy.

Rеferences

  1. Mankins, J. C. (1995) Technology Readiness Levels: A White Paper. Washington, DC: NASA Office of Space Access and Technology.
  2. S. Government Accountability Office (2020) Technology Readiness Assessment Guide: Best Practices for Evaluating the Readiness of Technology for Use in Acquisition Programs and Projects. GAO-20-48G. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office.
  3. S. Department of Defense & National Defense Industrial Association (2022) Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) Deskbook. Version 2022. Washington, DC: Office of the Secretary of Defense.
  4. Sauser, B., Verma, D., Ramírez-Márquez, J. & Gove, R. (2006) From TRL to SRL: The Concept of Systems Readiness Levels, in Conference on Systems Engineering Research. Los Angeles, CA, pp. 1–10. Available at: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:16808899.
  5. Gove, R. (2007) Development of an Integration Ontology for Systems Operational Effectiveness. PhD dissertation. Stevens Institute of Technology.
  6. Sauser, B., Ramírez-Márquez, J., Henry, D. & DiMarzio, D. (2008) A System Maturity Index for the Systems Engineering Life Cycle, International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 673–691. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISE.2008.020680.
  7. Sauser, B., Forbes, E., Long, M. & McGrory, S. (2009) Defining an Integration Readiness Level for Defense Acquisition, INCOSE International Symposium, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 352–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2009.tb00949.x.
  8. United States Congress (2009) Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (WSARA). Public Law 111-23, §104 “Assessment of Technological Maturity of Critical Technologies”. 22 May 2009.
  9. European Commission (2023) Horizon Europe Work Programme: General Annexes. Technology Readiness Levels (TRL). Brussels: European Commission.
  10. Abbas, A. & Nomvar, M. (2024) Commercial Readiness Level (CRL) Framework for Deep Tech Commercialisation. Sydney: University of Sydney.
  11. Australian Renewable Energy Agency (2014) Commercial Readiness Index for Renewable Energy Sectors. Canberra: ARENA.
  12. Ukrainian National Office of Intellectual Property and Innovations (2024) Matrytsia otsinky tekhnolohii [Technology Assessment Matrix]. Information briefing. Kyiv: UANIPIN. Available at: https://nipo.gov.ua/matrytsia-otsinky-tekhnolohij/.
  13. Kyzym, M. O., Khaustova, V. Ye., Reshetniak, O. I., Ostapenko, V. M., Lutsenko, N. L., Khaustov, M. M. & Bondarenko, D. V. (2021) Intehratsiia osvity ta nauky v Ukraini na bazi modeli mezhuvannia universytetu maibutnoho [Integration of education and science in Ukraine based on the model of the university of the future]. Monograph. Kharkiv: FOP Liburkina L. M. https://doi.org/10.32983/978-617-7801-31-2.
  14. Khaustova, V. Ye., Reshetniak, O. I., Zinchenko, V. A. & Kryvanych, M. V. (2021) Intehralna otsinka osvitnoi, naukovoi i innovatsiinoi diialnosti ta doslidzhennia ikh vplyvu na ekonomichnyi rozvytok Ukrainy [Integral assessment of educational, scientific and innovative activity and study of their impact on the economic development of Ukraine], Biznes Inform, no. 12, pp. 114–123. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2021-12-114-123.
  15. Matiushenko, I. Yu., Khaustova, V. Ye. & Kniaziev, S. I. (2017) Instytutsiina pidtrymka innovatsiinykh naukovo-doslidnykh rozrobok u protsesi formuvannia iedynoho doslidnytskoho prostoru YeS ta Ukrainy [Institutional support for innovative R&D in the process of creating a European Research Area and Ukraine], Science and Innovation, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 5–18. https://doi.org/10.15407/scin13.02.005.
  16. Khaustov, M. M. (2023) Startapy: stvorennia ta mashtabuvannia [Startups: Creation and scaling]. Monograph. Kharkiv: FOP Liburkina L. M. https://doi.org/10.32983/978-617-7801-44-2.
  17. Khaustova, V. Ye., Kostenko, D. M. & Ismailov, A. (2025) Svitovyi dosvid stvorennia ta rozvytku industrialnykh parkiv [World experience in the creation and development of industrial parks], Biznes Inform, no. 10, pp. 142–155. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2025-10-142-155.

The article was received 04.09.2026

Quote article, APA style

Kyzym M. , Khaustova V. 04.09.2026. Valleys of death in the innovation cycle: diagnosing structural gaps in the industrial system through the development readiness chain. Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology. 2026. №3. 206-212 pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2026-3-37

Quote article, MLA style

Kyzym M. , Khaustova V. Valleys of death in the innovation cycle: diagnosing structural gaps in the industrial system through the development readiness chain. Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology. 04.09.2026. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2026-3-37