# 28 230-240 View full article

УДК: 311.172:330.341.1(477)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2021-4-28

Oleksandr POPOV
PhD in Economics, First Deputy Chairman of the Board, Joint Stock Company «FED»
Serhiі MEKHOVYCH
Doctor of Economics, Professor, Professor of the Department of Business Economics and International Economic Relations, National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute»

JEL classification: O32

Abstract

Methodological recommendations for the use of technological audit as a mandatory part of substantiating directions and expediency of carrying out reengineering innovative transformations at the enterprise are developed in the article. The approach to understanding the essence and types of technological audit and their relationship with the reengineering process of the organization is proposed. The functions of a technological audit in the context of an innovatively transformed enterprise are substantiated, with an emphasis on planning, organization and control. The general context of using the results of the technological audit for the organization and management of innovative process transformations of the production and technological base at the enterprise is outlined. It is established that the technological audit plan is a key strategic management tool that allows assessing the overall scope and nature of work related to the innovative transformation of production, to compare the main forecasted indicators with the actual ones. The main procedures of the technological audit of the enterprise production base are proposed, among which the following are highlighted: analysis of physical and moral wear and tear of the main production assets; development of a general project for technological reengineering; formation of a portfolio of projects for technological reengineering of the enterprise and the selection of organizational and functional approaches to the implementation of the overall project. The project stages of the technological rehabilitation of production and approaches to them are disclosed. Considered models of resource distribution in the development of a general project for the technological rehabilitation of production. It was established that in the process of deploying the reengineering program, its implementation measures can be divided into two types that improve business, and measures that are elements of reengineering and fundamentally change the efficiency of business and all production activities.

Keywords: innovations, technological audit, technological rehabilitation, reengineering, projects, models, stages of technological audit.

References

  1. Mehovich, S.A. (2013). Formirovanie regional‘nyh mezhotraslevyh svjazej na osnove koncepcii tehnologicheskogo reinzhiniringa. [Formation of regional interindustry relations based on the concept of technological reengineering]. Schedra sadyba plius. Kharkiv. Ukraine.
  2. Gunasekaran, A., Kobu, B. (2002). «Modelling and analysis of business process reengineering». International Journal of Production Research. vol. 40. no. 11, pp. 2521-2546.
  3. Dezdar, Sh., Ainin, S. (2011). «Examining ERP implementation success from a project environment perspective». Business Process Management Journal. vol. 17. Issue 6, pp. 919-939.
  4. Allen, P.H. (2002). Reinzhiniring banka: programma vyzhivanija i uspeha/ [Bank reengineering: a program for survival and success]. Al’pina Pablisher. Moscow. Russia.
  5. Hammer, M. (1995). The reengineering revolution: handbook. Harper Business. N.-Y. USA.
  6. Hirooka, M. (2006). Innovation Dynamism and Economic Growth. A Nonlinear Perspective. Chelten-ham. MA: Edward Elgar. Northampton. UK.
  7. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance – Lessons from Japan. (London, Pinter Publishers). Available at: www.unece.org/fileadmin.
  8. Kondrat’ev, N.D. (2002). Bol’shie cikly kon#junktury i teorija predvidenija. [Large cycles of conjuncture and the theory of foresight]. Jekonomika. Moscow. Russia.
  9. Hammer, M., Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. HarperCollins. N.-Y. USA.
  10. Davenport, T.H. (1993). Process Innovation, Reengineering Work through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press. Boston. USA.
  11. Ojhman, E.G., Popov, Je.V. (1997). Reinzhiniring biznesa: Reinzhiniring organizacij i informacionnye tehnologii. [Reengineering of business: Reengineering of organizations and information technologies]. Finansy i statistika. Moscow. Russia.
  12. Hess, T., Brecht, L. (1995). State of the Art des Business Process Redesign: Darstellung und Vergleich Bestehender Methoden. Dr. Th.Gabler Verlag. Wiesbaden. Germany.
  13. Schumacher, W.D. Managing Barriers to Reengineering Success. BPR Online Learning Center. Available at: http://www.prosci.com
  14. Kodak Corp. Overview of Kodak Reengineering Methodology. In: Beyond the Basics of Reengineering: Survival Tactics for the ‘90s. Institute of Industrial Engineers (ed.). White Plains. Quality Resources. N.-Y. USA.
  15. Mensch, G. (1979). Title Stalemate in technology: innovations overcome the depression. Publisher Cambridge. Ballinger Pub. Co. Massachusetts. USA.
  16. Hirooka, M. (2006). Innovation Dynamism and Economic Growth. A Nonlinear Perspective. Chelten-ham. MA: Edward Elgar. Northampton. UK.
  17. Mouder, Dzh., Jelmagrabi, S. (1981). Issledovanie operacij. [Operations research]. Mir. Moscow. Russia.

The article was received 28.09.2021

Quote article, APA style

Oleksandr Popov, Serhiі Mekhovych . 28.09.2021. Technological audit in the concept of technological re-engineering. The journal "Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology". 2021 / #4. 230-240pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2021-4-28

Quote article, MLA style

Oleksandr Popov, Serhiі Mekhovych . "Technological audit in the concept of technological re-engineering". The journal "Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology". 28.09.2021. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2021-4-28

Quote article, translit