# 43 243-247 View full article

УДК 338.45:69.003:005.334:519.86

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2026-3-43

Krychevska Yuliia Vasylivna,
PhD in Economics, Associate Professor at the Department of Management in Construction,
Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7036-3376
Chernenko Maksym Eduardovych,
PhD Student, specialty 051 (C1 Economics),
Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0363-7221

JEL classification: C61; C63; D21; L74; M21

The purpose of the article is to develop a structural-dynamic model of economic resilience for construction development enterprises under systemic uncertainty, interpreting resilience as the ability of an interconnected economic system to remain within a viability domain under interacting and cascading disturbances. The study combines systems and structural-functional approaches, dynamic-systems theory, network analysis, scenario modeling, and Monte Carlo simulation. A vector of normalized economic parameters represents enterprise condition, while a time-varying transmission matrix describes how financial, resource, operational, project, contractual, and coordination deviations propagate through interdependencies. The model distinguishes between insufficient reserve and critical boundaries, and structural amplification of disturbances. A normalized distance to the viability boundary measures the current reserve, while the spectral radius of the absolute transmission matrix diagnoses damping, critical persistence, or cascading amplification. Resilience is also expressed as the probability of remaining inside the viability domain over a specified horizon. A risk-sensitive stabilization problem links intervention costs, conditional value-at-risk, and a minimum acceptable probability of viability. Monte Carlo simulation shows that enterprises with the same initial reserve may exhibit different resilience due to their transmission structure: an amplification coefficient above 1 can trigger cascading losses before conventional indicators reach critical thresholds. Scientific novelty lies in treating the internal transmission structure as an independent source of fragility and in combining viability geometry, spectral analysis, and probabilistic assessment into a single managerial model. Practical value lies in identifying key channels and selecting targeted measures such as liquidity buffers, supply diversification, portfolio sequencing, and critical resource reservation. Further research should empirically estimate transmission matrices and test the proposed indicators.

Keywords: economic resilience; construction development; systemic uncertainty; viability; shock transmission; cascading risk; system dynamics; managerial intervention.

Rеferences

  1. ISO 31000:2018 (2018) Risk management – Guidelines. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html.
  2. ISO 22301:2019 (2019) Security and resilience – Business continuity management systems – Requirements. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/75106.html.
  3. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (2022) Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2022: Our World at Risk: Transforming Governance for a Resilient Future. Geneva: UNDRR. Available at: https://www.undrr.org/gar/gar2022-our-world-risk-gar.
  4. Hynes, W., Lees, M. and Müller, J. (eds.) (2020) Systemic Thinking for Policy Making: The Potential of Systems Analysis for Addressing Global Policy Challenges in the 21st Century. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/879c4f7a-en.
  5. Williams, T. A., Gruber, D. A., Sutcliffe, K. M., Shepherd, D. A. and Zhao, E. Y. (2017) Organizational Response to Adversity: Fusing Crisis Management and Resilience Research Streams, Academy of Management Annals, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 733–769. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0134.
  6. Duchek, S. (2020) Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization, Business Research, vol. 13, pp. 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7.
  7. Hillmann, J. and Guenther, E. (2021) Organizational Resilience: A Valuable Construct for Management Research?, International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 7–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12239.
  8. Evenseth, L. L., Sydnes, M. and Gausdal, A. H. (2022) Building Organizational Resilience Through Organizational Learning: A Systematic Review, Frontiers in Communication, vol. 7, art. 837386. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.837386.
  9. Kedir, N., Siraj, N. and Fayek, A. R. (2023) Application of System Dynamics in Construction Engineering and Management: Content Analysis and Systematic Literature Review, Advances in Civil Engineering, vol. 2023, art. 1058063. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1058063.
  10. Zungu, Z., Laryea, S. and Nkado, R. (2025) A critical literature review on organizational resilience: why current frameworks are insufficient for contracting firms in the construction industry, International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 25, no. 15, pp. 1847–1858. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2025.2486649.
  11. Tierra-Arévalo, J. M., Pardo-Ferreira, M. C., Arezes, P. M. and Rubio-Romero, J. C. (2025) Quantifying resilience potentials in construction: pilot evaluation of the resilience assessment grid, Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 13, art. 1675086. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1675086.
  12. Diem, C., Borsos, A., Reisch, T., Kertész, J. and Thurner, S. (2022) Quantifying firm-level economic systemic risk from nation-wide supply networks, Scientific Reports, vol. 12, art. 7719. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11522-z.
  13. Fesun, A. S., Konchakivskyi, O. I., Stepaniuk, R. B., Ryzhakova, H. M. and Fedorova, Ya. Yu. (2024) Kontseptualno-analitychni osoblyvosti zabezpechennia biznes-stiikosti pidpryiemstv u multyproiektnomu seredovyshchi budivelnoho developmentu [Conceptual and analytical features of ensuring business resilience of enterprises in a multi-project environment of construction development], Budivelne vyrobnytstvo, no. 77, pp. 58–66. https://doi.org/10.36750/2524-2555.77.58-66.
  14. Krychevska, Yu., Ryzhakova, H., Shpakov, A., Pokolenko, V. and Prykhodko, D. (2024) Tsyfrova ekosystema v budivelnomu developmenti: kontseptualno-teoretychni aspekty transformatsii ta upravlinski imperatyvy [Digital ecosystem in construction development: conceptual and theoretical aspects of transformation and management imperatives], Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, no. 60, pp. 174–182. https://doi.org/10.32347/2412-9933.2024.60.174-182.
  15. Khomenko, O., Ryzhakova, H., Malykhina, O., Petrenko, H. and Stepaniuk, R. (2023) Tsilovi priorytety ta formalizovani indykatory transformatsii operatsiinykh system steikkholderiv budivnytstva [Target priorities and formalized indicators of transformation of operating systems of construction stakeholders], Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, no. 56, pp. 173–180. https://doi.org/10.32347/2412-9933.2023.56.173-180.
  16. Romanenko, O. V. (2025) Budivelna developerska kompaniia yak skladna adaptyvna systema [Construction real estate development company as a complex adaptive system], Ekonomichnyi prostir, no. 204, pp. 266–272. https://doi.org/10.30838/EP.204.266-272.
  17. Hutsaliuk, O. M. (2016) Ekonomichne obhruntuvannia protsesu utvorennia korporatyvnykh intehratsiinykh obiednan [Economic rationale for the creation of corporate integration associations], Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomika, issue 1 (47), vol. 2, pp. 330–334.
  18. Hutsaliuk, O. M. and Cherevatenko, V. A. (2017) Korporatyvni mekhanizmy zabezpechennia ekonomichnoi bezpeky velykomasshtabnykh ekonomiko-vyrobnychykh system [Corporate mechanisms for ensuring economic security of large-scale economic and production systems], Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, no. 6 (192), pp. 60–71.
  19. Hutsaliuk, O. M. and Nebaba, N. O. (2017) Sotsiokulturni aspekty rozpodilu ta realizatsii korporatyvnoho kontroliu v intehrovanomu korporatyvnomu obiednanni [Socio-cultural aspects of the distribution and implementation of corporate control in an integrated corporate group], Efektyvna ekonomika, no. 1. Available at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=7207.
  20. Bondar, Yu. A., Lehkinkova, N. I. and Fabryka, I. V. (2020) Osoblyvosti mekhanizmu derzhavnoi pidtrymky natsionalnoho tovarovyrobytsia v umovakh SOT [Peculiarities of the state support mechanism for national producers under WTO conditions], Art of Scientific Thought, no. 10, pp. 22–29. https://doi.org/10.36074/2617-7064.10.005.
  21. Hutsaliuk, O. M. (2016) Postanova zadachi otsiniuvannia bezpeky intehratsiinoho rozvytku velykomasshtabnykh ekonomiko-vyrobnychykh system [Statement of the problem of assessing the security of integration development of large-scale economic and production systems], Biznes Inform, no. 9, pp. 142–149.

The article was received 04.09.2026

Quote article, APA style

Krychevska Y. , Chernenko M. 04.09.2026. Structural-dynamic model of the economic resilience of construction development enterprises under systemic uncertainty. Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology. 2026. №3. 243-247 pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2026-3-43

Quote article, MLA style

Krychevska Y. , Chernenko M. Structural-dynamic model of the economic resilience of construction development enterprises under systemic uncertainty. Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology. 04.09.2026. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2026-3-43