# 3 24-27 View full article

УДК 005.332.1:338.24

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2026-1-3

Goryuk Yevgeniy,
PhD student, Department of Management, Business and Administration,
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics,
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4519-8990
Lepeyko Tetyana,
Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of Management, Business and Administration Department,
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics,
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8667-509X

JEL classification: L21, M10, O10, H56

The article examines the strategic resilience of manufacturing enterprises as a key management capability to ensure viability and competitiveness in war and post-war recovery. The starting point is that in scientific and applied discussions, the concept of «resilience» is often identified with maintaining continuity or a rapid return to the previous level of functioning, which is insufficient for production systems with high capital intensity, energy dependence, and technological constraints on readjustment. The aim of the article is to conceptualize strategic resilience specifically for manufacturing enterprises and develop a two-phase management framework that links theoretical approaches to strategic resilience with the systematization of tools and management decisions. Methodologically, the article is conceptual and based on an analytical synthesis of scientific sources on strategic management, organizational and logistical resilience, risk management, and continuity, as well as on logical modeling of cause-and-effect relationships in the production system. As a result of the research, the content of strategic resilience was clarified and distinguished from robustness and adaptability. It was proved that for manufacturing enterprises to withstand the shock of war does not mean preserving the strategic trajectory. A two-phase framework for strategic resilience during the war and post-war recovery was proposed, reflecting a managed transition from the dominance of tools for maintaining critical functions to the reconfiguration of capacities, resources, coordination, and competencies. The practical significance of the results lies in the possibility of using the framework for strategic diagnostics, for determining priorities during the war, and for forming modernization and development programs during post-war reconstruction. Prospects for further research include the empirical validation of the framework, namely, testing which management tools in specific sub-industries of production yield the best results in terms of continuity, productivity, and market adaptation.

Keywords: strategic resilience, manufacturing enterprise, war, post-war recovery, robustness, adaptability, management decisions.

Rеferences

  1. (2023). World Bank; Government of Ukraine; European Commission; United Nations. (2024). Ukraine Third Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (RDNA3).
  2. Hamel,, Välikangas, L. (2003). «The quest for resilience». Harvard Business Review. № 81(9). рр. 52–63.
  3. Lengnick-Hall,A., Beck, T.E., Lengnick-Hall, M.L. (2011). «Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management». Human Resource Management Review. № 21(3). рр. 243–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.07.001.
  4. Sheffi, (2005). The resilient enterprise: Overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. MIT Press.
  5. Teece,J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1997). «Dynamic capabilities and strategic management». Strategic Management Journal. № 18(7). рр.509–533.
  6. Wieland,, Wallenburg, C.M. (2012). «The Influence of Relational Competencies on Supply Chain Resilience: A Relational View». International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. № 43(4). рр. 300-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-08-2012-0243.
  7. Ponomarov,Y., Holcomb, M.C. (2009). «Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience». The International Journal of Logistics Management. № 20(1). рр. 124–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090910954873.
  8. Christopher,, Peck, H. (2004). «Building the resilient supply chain». The International Journal of Logistics Management. № 15 (2). рр. 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090410700275.
  9. ISO 22316:2017. Available at:https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:iso:22316:ed-1:v1:en.
  10. Dolgui,, Ivanov, D. (2021). «Ripple effect and supply chain disruption management: New trends and research directions». International Journal of Production Research. № 59(1). рр. 102–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1840148.

The article was received 25.02.2026

Quote article, APA style

Goryuk Yevgeniy, Lepeyko Tetyana . 25.02.2026. Strategic resilience of enterprises in conditions of war and post-war recovery: concept and management decisions. The journal "Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology". 2026 / #1. 24-27pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2026-1-3

Quote article, MLA style

Goryuk Yevgeniy, Lepeyko Tetyana . "Strategic resilience of enterprises in conditions of war and post-war recovery: concept and management decisions". The journal "Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology". 25.02.2026. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2026-1-3

Quote article, translit