# 37 189-192 View full article

УДК 005.336.4:005.95/.96

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-3-37

Nazarov Nikita,
Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Management, Business and Administration,
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8762-2248
Khomenko Petro,
PhD Student of the Social Economics Department,
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7201-9921

JEL classification: M12, M53, J24

The article substantiates the theoretical and methodological foundations of assessing the professional development of managerial personnel in the context of post-war economic recovery. Professional development is conceptualized as a continuous, systemic process of enhancing managerial knowledge, competencies, and skills, which directly affect organizational efficiency and competitiveness. The study emphasizes the need to design a comprehensive system of indicators and an integral index that enables the quantitative assessment of managerial growth. The proposed methodological framework relies on factor analysis and the taxonomy method, applied to industrial enterprises of the Kharkiv region. The results reveal that some companies demonstrate high investment efficiency in personnel development, while others face challenges in automation and career advancement. The integral index enables the correlation of managerial performance outcomes, such as increased revenue and reduced losses, with investments in training, social benefits, digitalization, and career planning. It provides a tool for monitoring efficiency and optimizing investment priorities. The findings highlight the multilevel character of managerial development (individual, organizational, national) and the significance of combining formal and informal learning mechanisms. A comprehensive approach to evaluating managerial staff ensures alignment of competencies with strategic organizational needs and supports evidence-based decisions on promotion, training, and motivation. The study concludes that institutionalization of systematic professional development, reinforced by collective agreements, personnel development funds, and digital knowledge management, is critical in post-war conditions. The outcomes possess theoretical and practical relevance, offering recommendations for differentiated strategies to enhance managerial effectiveness and adaptability of enterprises to the challenges of the modern economy. Ultimately, professional development of managerial personnel is not only an economic and social category but also a determinant of national recovery and long-term competitiveness.

Keywords: managerial personnel, enterprise, training, efficiency, integral indicator.

Rеferences

  1. Hetman, O. O., & Bilodid, A. O. (2017). Innovatsiini metody rozvytku personalu [Innovative methods of personnel development]. Hlobalni ta natsionalni problemy ekonomiky, vol. 17, pp. 556–561. Available at: https://surl.lu/vlmmaa.
  2. Hrishnova, O. A., & Kharazishvili, Yu. M. (2019). Demohrafichna bezpeka Ukrainy: indykatory, riven, zahrozy [Demographic security of Ukraine: indicators, level, threats]. Demography and Social Economy, no. 2(36), pp. 65–80. https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2019.02.065.
  3. Drahan, O., Berher, A., & Miziuk, A. (2024). Profesiinyi rozvytok personalu zghidno umov transformatsii u pidpryiemnytstvi [Professional development of personnel under transformation conditions in entrepreneurship]. Kyivskyi ekonomichnyi naukovyi zhurnal, no. 4, pp. 71–78. https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-765X/2024-4-10.
  4. Dudko, S. V. (2017). Profesiinyi rozvytok personalu: tekhnolohii otsiniuvannia ta mekhanizm motyvatsii [Professional development of personnel: assessment technologies and motivation mechanism]. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Ekonomichni nauky, no. 6(2), pp. 57–65. Available at: https://journals.khnu.km.ua/vestnik/pdf/ekon/pdfbase/2017/2017_6_2/jrn/pdf/12.pdf.
  5. Ivanisov, O. V., & Achkasova, O. V. (2025). Problemy ta perspektyvy profesiinoho rozvytku upravlinskoho personalu v umovakh povoiennoi ekonomiky [Problems and prospects of professional development of management personnel in the post-war economy]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, no. 71, pp. 240–246. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-71-134.
  6. Kara, N. I., & Pshyk-Kovalska, O. O. (2018). Profesiinyi rozvytok personalu v umovakh mizhnarodnoi ekonomichnoi diialnosti pidpryiemstv [Professional development of personnel in the conditions of international economic activity of enterprises]. Aktualni problemy rozvytku ekonomiky rehionu, vol. 14(1), pp. 23–35. Available at: https://surl.lt/nkvjib.
  7. Levchenko, A. O. (2018). Profesiinyi rozvytok personalu v umovakh aktyvizatsii innovatsiino-intehratsiinykh protsesiv [Professional development of personnel under the conditions of activation of innovation and integration processes]. Tsentralnoukrainskyi naukovyi visnyk. Ekonomichni nauky, vol. 1, pp. 124–134. https://doi.org/10.32515/2663-1636.2018.1(34).124-134.
  8. Nazarova, H. V., Laptiev, V. I., & Korsakov, D. O. (2014). Otsinka konkurentospromozhnosti systemy upravlinnia personalom pidpryiemstva: monohrafiia [Assessment of the competitiveness of the enterprise personnel management system: monograph]. Kharkiv: Vydavnytstvo KhNEU im. S. Kuznetsia, 188 p.
  9. Syvolap, L. A., Khavalits, S. S., & Nikolaienko, R. B. (2021). Analiz profesiinoho rozvytku personalu pidpryiemstva u suchasnykh umovakh hospodariuvannia [Analysis of professional development of enterprise personnel in modern economic conditions]. Efektyvna ekonomika, no. 12. https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2021.12.13..
  10. Pukhovska, L. P., Vornachev, A. O., & Leu, S. O. (2015). Profesiinyi rozvytok personalu pidpryiemstv u krainakh Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu: posibnyk [Professional development of enterprise personnel in the countries of the European Union: manual]. L. P. Pukhovska (Ed.). Kyiv: IPTO NAPNU, 176 p.
  11. Semykina, M. V. (2004). Ekonomichna motyvatsiia investuvannia v rozvytok liudskoho kapitalu pidpryiemstva [Economic motivation of investment in the development of enterprise human capital]. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, no. 5(35), pp. 178–185.
  12. Frolenkova, N. A. (2020). Osvita i profesiinyi rozvytok personalu yak element kadrovoho menedzhmentu orhanizatsii [Education and professional development of personnel as an element of organizational human resource management]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu vodnoho hospodarstva ta pryrodokorystuvannia. Ekonomichni nauky, vol. 1, pp. 210–218. https://doi.org/10.31713/ve1202017.
  13. Personal vs professional development: a comprehensive guide. (2023, August 21). Available at: https://uk.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/personal-vs-professional-development.

The article was received 09.08.2025

Quote article, APA style

Nazarov Nikita, Khomenko Petro. 09.08.2025 . Methodological support for assessing the professional development of managerial personnel. The journal "Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology". 2025 / #3. 189-192pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-3-37

Quote article, MLA style

Nazarov Nikita, Khomenko Petro. "Methodological support for assessing the professional development of managerial personnel". The journal "Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology". 09.08.2025 . https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-3-37

Quote article, translit