# 33 172-176 View full article

УДК 338.45:69:004.9:005.332.1

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-4-33

Onofriichuk Oleh,
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Economics,
Academician Stepan Demianchuk International University of Economics and Humanities,
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3458-7926

JEL classification: C13, L74, M15, Q01

Published: 19.12.2025

The article substantiates the need to revise traditional approaches to construction project management in the context of digital transformation, the implementation of sustainable development imperatives, and the growing role of network-based stakeholder interaction. It is demonstrated that the classical performance assessment model, focused on cost, time, and quality indicators, is methodologically insufficient for biosphere-compatible construction projects, where outcomes are a multidimensional combination of economic, environmental, social, and managerial-digital effects throughout the entire life cycle of an asset. Biosphere-compatible construction is understood as a systemic project activity that integrates resource and energy efficiency, minimization of environmental impacts, social performance, ecosystem-based stakeholder coordination, digital control of processes, and the resilience of managerial decisions. The paper reveals the essence of economic–digital management models for biosphere-compatible construction projects as integrated ecosystem mechanisms, combining financial planning and control instruments with digital platforms for data collection, processing, and analytical decision support. A typology of such models is proposed based on dominant managerial functions and digital toolsets (platform-based, BIM-oriented, process-digital, and data-driven models), accounting for the specific features of managing complex biosphere-compatible projects. A multidimensional methodology for assessing the effectiveness of economic–digital management models is developed by integrating qualitative structuring and quantitative evaluation through a system of criteria and indicators across six key effectiveness dimensions. The methodology applies an integrated performance indicator, normalizes indicators, and uses weighted aggregation via the Analytic Hierarchy Process, ensuring comparability of results and preserving managerial interpretability. The approbation of the proposed methodology, as applied to a public investment energy-efficiency and heat-recovery project registered in the DREAM digital system, confirms its practical applicability and analytical value for managerial diagnostics and evidence-based decision-making in the field of biosphere-compatible construction.

Keywords: biosphere-compatible construction; economic–digital management models; project management; digital transformation; sustainable development; integral effectiveness assessment; resilience; stakeholder coordination.

Rеferences

  1. Krychevska, Yu., Ryzhakova, H., Shpakov, A., Pokolenko, V., & Prykhodko, D. (2024). Tsyfrova ekosystema v budivelnomu develo pmenti: kontseptualno-teoretychni aspekty transformatsii ta upravlinski imperatyvy [Digital ecosystem in construction development: conceptual and theoretical aspects of transformation and management imperatives]. Management of Development of Complex Systems, No. 60, Pp. 174–182. https://doi.org/10.32347/2412-9933.2024.60.174-182.
  2. Druzhynin, M., Malykhina, O., Herhi, M., Katsiuba, I., Kyryk, Y., & Yuitao, W. (2025). Basic functionalities of construction organization and management in the concept of digital transformation of enterprises’ operational systems. Building Production, No. 78, Pp. 22–29. https://doi.org/10.36750/2524-2555.78.22-29.
  3. Bielenkova, O., Dubinin, D., & Kalashnikov, D. (2022). Digital transformation of construction and territory development as an imperative for the formation of strategies for construction process participants. Urban Planning and Territorial Development, No. 81, Pp. 13–22. https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2022.81.
  4. Chen, Z.-S., Yang, L.-L., Chin, K.-S., Yang, Y., Pedrycz, W., Chang, J.-P., Martínez, L., & Skibniewski, M. J. (2021). Sustainable building material selection: An integrated multi-criteria large group decision making framework. Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 113, Part A, Article 107903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107903.
  5. Park, C., Son, M., Kim, J., Kim, B., Ahn, Y., & Kwon, N. (2025). TOPSIS and AHP-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for evaluating redevelopment in old residential projects. Sustainability, Vol. 17, No. 15, Article 7072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17157072.
  6. Bajwa, A. U. R., Siriwardana, C., & Shahzad, W., et al. (2025). Material selection in the construction industry: a systematic literature review on multi-criteria decision making. Environmental Systems and Decisions, Vol. 45, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-025-10001-w.
  7. Theilig, K., Lourenço, B., & Reitberger, R., et al. (2024). Life cycle assessment and multi-criteria decision-making for sustainable building parts: criteria, methods, and application. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 29, Pp. 1965–1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-024-02331-9.
  8. Cheng, W., Hu, M., & Wu, C. (2025). Enhancing green building decision-making with a hybrid fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS model for material selection. Applied Water Science, Vol. 15, Article 129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-025-02481-7.
  9. Xu, T., Liu, W., & Zhu, Z. (2023). Multi-criteria decision-making methods applied to achieve sustainable design: a systematic review. Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 3, Pp. 2725–2734. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.273.
  10. Horbach, M., Honchar, V., Kolomiiets, V., Shtyl, A., & Pelekhatyi, R. (2025). Systematyzatsiia kryteriiv i pokaznykiv efektyvnosti realizatsii proiektiv [Systematization of criteria and performance indicators of project implementation]. Building Production, No. 80, Pp. 107–117. https://doi.org/10.36750/2524-2555.80.107-117.
  11. DREAM Ecosystem. (2025). Proiekt «Kapitalnyi remont uteplennia stin (zakhody z enerhozberezhennia) opornoho zakladu zahalnoi serednoi osvity “Velykosorochynskyi litsei im. M. V. Hoholia”» [Project “Major repair of wall insulation (energy saving measures) of the Velikosorochyntsi Lyceum”]. Available at: https://dream.gov.ua/ua/project/DREAM-UA-110325-01DC3559/profile.
  12. European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. Available at: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en.
  13. European Commission. (2020). A renovation wave for Europe – greening our buildings, creating jobs, improving lives. Available at: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/energy-efficiency/energy-efficient-buildings/renovation-wave_en.
  14. European Commission. (2025). EU energy security strategy. Available at: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/energy-security_en.
  15. Government of Ukraine. (2025). Vidnovlennia Ukrainy [Recovery of Ukraine]. Available at: https://recovery.gov.ua.
  16. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020). Digital government policy framework. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/governance/digital-government/.
  17. Hutsaliuk, O. M. (2015). Zabezpechennia zakhystu aktsionernoho tovarystva vid sprob nedruzhnoho zlyttia-pohlynannia [Ensuring the protection of a joint-stock company from attempts of unfriendly mergers and acquisitions]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats KhNPU im. H. S. Skovorody. Seriia: Ekonomika, no. 15, pp. 149-158.
  18. Hutsaliuk, O. M., Lozova, T. P., Skoptsov, K. V., & Ksenofontov, D. V. (2023). Ekonomiko-tsyfrove modeliuvannia reinzhynirynhu finansovoi diialnosti vitchyznianykh pidpryiemstv [Economic and digital modeling of reengineering of financial activities of domestic enterprises]. Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy, 1 (44), pp. 106-113. https://doi.org/10.37405/1729-7206.2023.1(44).106-113
  19. Hutsaliuk, O., Zakharchenko, O., & Yakusheva, O. (2022). State and regional policy in the agricultural sector of the national economy of Ukraine. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats ChDTU. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky, no. 66, pp. 5-16. https://doi.org/10.24025/2306-4420.66.2022.268613
  20. Salyha, K. S., Hutsaliuk, O. M., & Nebaba, N. O. (2018). Formuvannia investytsiinoi pryvablyvosti ta zabezpechennia ekonomichnoi efektyvnosti korporatyvnoho intehratsiinoho obiednannia [Formation of investment attractiveness and ensuring economic efficiency of a corporate integration association]. Efektyvna ekonomika, no. 4. http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=7217

Quote article, APA style

Onofriichuk Oleh. . Methodological foundations for assessing the effectiveness of economic-digital models for biosphere-compatible construction project management. The journal "Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology". 2025 / #4. 172-176pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-4-33

Quote article, MLA style

Onofriichuk Oleh. "Methodological foundations for assessing the effectiveness of economic-digital models for biosphere-compatible construction project management". The journal "Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology". . https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-4-33

Quote article, translit