# 8 50-55 View full article

УДК 005.591.6:005.311

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-3-8

Vytvytska Olga,
D.Sc. in Economics, Professor, Professor of the Department of Public Administration, Management of Innovation and Extension,
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2510-3562
Kondrat Oleksandr,
PhD in Economics, Doctoral Candidate,
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2021-2639
Krykunenko Kateryna,
PhD in Economics, Associate Professor of the Department of Public Administration, Management of Innovation and Extension,
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1530-216X

JEL classification: O30, O32

The article carries out a systematic study of the essence, content and classification differentiation of innovative management tools in the context of the current challenges of digital transformation. Given the multi-component nature of the modern innovation process, the study focuses on identifying conceptual approaches to the interpretation of innovative tools that have been formed in scientific literature and their critical rethinking considering modern organizational realities. The development of a theoretically consistent and methodologically holistic model of the classification of innovation management tools is determined, considering their functional purpose, level of integration into the management system and stages of the innovation cycle. Within the framework of the implementation of the task, a comparative analysis of five dominant scientific approaches to understanding the nature of IIM (functional, process, technological, systemic and behavioral) was carried out, based on which a typological matrix of modern tools was formed. Particular attention is paid to digital platforms, IMS-type software, modern management methodologies (Lean Startup, Stage-Gate, TRIZ), as well as analytical models that allow for strategic forecasting of innovation potential. As a result, a set of factors determining the effectiveness of IIM implementation was formulated, and a conceptual logical-functional matrix for their integration into the management practice of organizations was proposed. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the combination of phase, functional and level approaches to the systematization of IIM within a single logical-functional matrix, which allows for flexible typology of tools considering the dynamics of the innovation cycle and organizational context.

Keywords: innovative management tools, classification, digital platforms, software, methodologies, innovation process, adaptability.

Rеferences

  1. Amabile, T. , & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior. no. 36. рр. 157-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001.
  2. Amini, M. (2015). Functional innovation tools in digital transformation: a comparative review. Journal of Technology Management. no. 12(3). рр. 45-62. Available at: https://example.com/amini2015.
  3. Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory. New York: Braziller. Available at: https://archive.org/details/generalsystemthe00bert.
  4. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Available at: https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=35305.
  5. Choudhari, A., Deshmukh, S., & Jain, M. (2023). Adaptive frameworks in innovation systems: A global synthesis. International Journal of Innovation Management. no. 27(2). рр. 124-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919623500021.
  6. Dyer, J. H., Gregersen, H. B., & Christensen, C. M. (2011). The Innovator’s DNA: Mastering the Five Skills of Disruptive Innovators. Harvard Business Press.
  7. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (2005). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
  8. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter. Available at: https://archive.org/details/technologypolicy0000free.
  9. Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Available at: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/content-analysis/book239401.
  10. Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter. Available at: https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/national-systems-of-innovation-9781855670634.html.
  11. Miķelsone, E., & Segers, J. (2022). Typology of Innovation Management Tools: A Systematic Review. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 7(1). рр. 45-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.01.003.
  12. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook.
  13. Mullashev, R. (2024). Bottlenecks in Innovation Scaling: Organizational and Methodological Gaps. Technovation. 115. рр. 102579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102579.
  14. (2023). Innovation Policies for the Future. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/innovation/.
  15. Rosenberg, N. (1994). Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History. Cambridge University Press.
  16. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal. 28(13). рр. 1319-1350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640.
  17. Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2018). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change.
  18. Zammar, H., Keller, C., & Rabe, M. (2023). Instrumental Configurations in Digital Innovation Ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 189. рр. 122326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122326.
  19. Zammar, A., Kovaleski, J. L., & Pagani, R. N. (2024). Innovation management tools: A comprehensive literature approach of the last three decades. Management Review Quarterly. 74(2). рр. 1119-1143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00329-5.
  20. Hidalgo, A., & Albors, J. (2008). Innovation management techniques and tools: A review from theory and practice. R&D Management. no. 38(2). рр. 113- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00503.x.
  21. (2020). ISO 56000:2020-Innovation management – Fundamentals and vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/69315.htm.

The article was received 02.08.2025

Quote article, APA style

Vytvytska Olga, Kondrat Oleksandr, Krykunenko Kateryna. 02.08.2025 . Methodological approach to the formation of innovative management tools. The journal "Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology". 2025 / #3. 50-55pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-3-8

Quote article, MLA style

Vytvytska Olga, Kondrat Oleksandr, Krykunenko Kateryna. "Methodological approach to the formation of innovative management tools". The journal "Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology". 02.08.2025 . https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-3-8

Quote article, translit