УДК 336.14

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-4-44

Alekseyenko Lyudmyla,
Doctor of Science in Economics, Professor, Professor of the Department of Management and Administration,
Ivano-Frankivsk Education and Research Institute of Management of the Western Ukrainian National
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8256-5587
Dmytryshyn Marta,
Ph. D. in Economics, Asociate Professor, Asociate Professor of the Department of
Management and Administration,
Ivano-Frankivsk Education and Research Institute of Management of the Western Ukrainian National
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0609-9764
Novitskyi Mykhailo,
Postgraduate of the S. I. Yuriy Department of Finance,
West Ukrainian National University,
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6159-170X

JEL classification: E62, F21, G20, H72

Published: 19.12.2025


The article examines decentralization, a complex process of institutionalization that aims to transform public economic management by transferring authority from central authorities to territorial communities. It is proven that economic power is the dispositive capacity to make decisions that influence the distribution of resources and the vectors of regional development. The sustainability of decentralization requires the simultaneous strengthening of formal (legislative) and informal (public control, transparency, anti-corruption monitoring) institutions. It is argued that, under conditions of global financial transformations, economic power and its institutions require the introduction of a two-tier model of intergovernmental fiscal relations (State – Community) to eliminate financial imbalances, enhance transparency, and maximize the approximation of public services to the population. The study reveals a disbalance between the revenue and expenditure powers of local self-government authorities and the institutional inadequacy of the horizontal financial equalization mechanism. The primary forms of transferring authoritative powers – deconcentration, decentralization, and devolution – are explored, with an emphasis on fiscal decentralization as the central institutional mechanism for transmitting economic power. Two key aspects characterize the dual function of budgetary decentralization: it enhances the efficiency of service provision by adapting to local needs, and it creates incentives for communities to expand their revenue base and attract investment. It is determined that without sufficient fiscal powers, other forms of decentralization remain merely declarative. The highest level of institutionalization is achieved by granting territorial communities the right to independently establish the rates for local taxes and fees, ensuring a direct link between political decisions and fiscal responsibility. The principles of ecological security are revealed as competition among communities encourages them to integrate environmental standards into investment-attracting strategies, develop green technological hubs, and reallocate resources in favor of ecologically oriented projects. In the context of global financial transformations, prospective directions for further research – to ensure the transition from formal autonomy to the genuine financial self-sufficiency of communities – are identified as: enhancing the financial self-sufficiency of territorial communities, digitalization of monitoring and management processes, and developing managerial competencies about the principles of ecological security and inclusivity.

Keywords: institutionalization; fiscal decentralization; local self-government authorities; finance; effects of decentralization; project financing; state credit programs; ecological security.

Rеferences

  1. Klynovyi D. V., Rohov P. D. (2017). Detsentralizatsiia: ekonomika, finansy ta bezpeka pryrodokorystuvannia [Decentralization: economy, finance and environmental security]. Social Development & Security, Vol. 2, No. 2. Pp. 34–67. Available at: https://paperssds.eu/index.php/JSPSDS/article/view/19/17.
  2. Li G., Zhou P., Wu R. (2025). Local government competition, fiscal decentralization, and environmental governance efficiency. Finance Research Letters, 86. Art. 108537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108537.
  3. Nikolaiev K. D., Semenets-Orlova I. A. (2024). Protses pryiniattia rishen u sferi ekolohichnoi bezpeky: vyklyky detsentralizatsii vlady v Ukraini [Decision-making process in the field of environmental security: challenges of power decentralization in Ukraine]. Publichne Uriaduvannia, Vol. 1, No. 38. Pp. 61–67. https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2024-1(38)-8.
  4. Babaiev V. Yu., Klymenko N. H., Berlizova V. A., Tymokha D. A. (2025). Realizatsiia ESG pryntsypiv u publichnomu ta korporatyvnomu upravlinni [Implementation of ESG principles in public and corporate governance]. Teoriia ta Praktyka Derzhavnoho Upravlinnia, Vol. 1, No. 80. Pp. 132–152. http://doi.org/10.26565/1727-6667-2025-1-08.
  5. Ren H., Xian Z., Zhu B., Lin H. (2025). Fiscal decentralization and regional innovation: Dual mechanisms of human capital mediation and financial development moderation. International Review of Economics & Finance, Vol. 102. Art. 104370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104370.
  6. Derzhavnyi veb-portal biudzhetu dlia hromadian [State web portal of the budget for citizens]. Available at: https://openbudget.gov.ua/.

Quote article, APA style

Alekseyenko Lyudmyla, Dmytryshyn Marta, Novitskyi Mykhailo. . Institutional mechanisms of decentralization of economic power in the conditions of global financial transformations: theoretical and applied aspects. The journal "Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology". 2025 / #4. 226-230pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-4-44

Quote article, MLA style

Alekseyenko Lyudmyla, Dmytryshyn Marta, Novitskyi Mykhailo. "Institutional mechanisms of decentralization of economic power in the conditions of global financial transformations: theoretical and applied aspects". The journal "Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology". . https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-4-44

Quote article, translit