# 9 56-61 View full article

УДК 005.95:005.591.6

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-3-9

Lebedynska Olena,
PhD in Economics, Associate Professor,
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7110-5211
Ivanisov Oleg,
PhD in Economics, Associate Professor,
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5757-824X
Achkasova Oksana,
PhD in Economics, Associate Professor,
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7137-3996

JEL classification: M12, O31, J24

The purpose of this article is to study and analyze modern innovative technologies and methods for assessing the effectiveness of management personnel, with an emphasis on their ability to harness and implement the creative potential of the organization in the post-war economy. The article examines the current challenges facing management personnel in enterprises during the post-war economy, which is characterized by uncertainty, limited resources, transformation of logistical and production processes, and the need for rapid adaptation to changes in the external environment. The key role of management personnel in shaping the strategic direction of the enterprise’s development, ensuring its operational integrity, coordinating interdepartmental collaboration, and making informed decisions is emphasized. Particular attention is paid to the use of innovative technologies in assessing the effectiveness of managers, which is particularly important in the context of digitalization, automation of production processes, and the development of information and communication systems. Modern methodological approaches to assessing the effectiveness of management personnel are considered, including the implementation of key performance indicators (KPIs), the use of big data, intelligent automation, blockchain technologies, feedback systems, and digital HRM platforms. Based on an analysis of modern foreign and domestic scientific thought, a systematic approach to forming an assessment toolkit is proposed, which considers not only productivity but also the creative potential, leadership ability, strategic thinking, and innovativeness of managers. It is substantiated that an effective assessment system contributes to strengthening an enterprise’s adaptability, its resistance to risks, and the formation of competitive advantages in the market. The practical significance of the proposed approach lies in its adaptability to various economic sectors and organizational structures, as well as in enhancing the effectiveness of personnel policy and strategic management in general.

Keywords: management personnel, performance, post-war economy, HR analytics, innovation, assessment, digital technologies, management personnel assessment, innovative technologies.

Rеferences

  1. Agarwal, V., Shiralkar, S., Aaher, S., & Jawade, S. (2021). The supply chain management revolution. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, vol. 10, iss. 10. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Venkesh-Agarwal/publication/356438894_The_Supply_Chain_Management_Revolution/links/619bac5d3068c54fa5118c38/The-Supply-Chain-Management-Revolution.pdf.
  2. Achkasova, O. V., Ivanisov, O. V., & Lebedynska, O. S. (2025). Innovatsiino-adaptyvnyi pidkhid do pidhotovky ta rozvytku upravlinskoho personalu u povoiennyi period [Innovative-adaptive approach to training and development of managerial staff in the post-war period]. Efektyvna ekonomika, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105.2025.3.52.
  3. European Commission. (n.d.). Company law and corporate governance. EU rules and activity in this area, Informal Company Law Expert Group, action plan on company law and corporate governance. Available at: https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/doing-business-eu/company-law-and-corporate-governance_en.
  4. Dipura, S., & Soediantono, D. (2022). Benefits of Key Performance Indicators (KPI) and proposed applications in the defense industry: A literature review. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, no. 3(4), pp. 23–33. https://doi.org/10.5555/ijosmas.v3i4.146.
  5. Gajdzik, B., & Wolniak, R. (2022). Smart production workers in terms of creativity and innovation: The implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 8, iss. 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8020068.
  6. Cameron, E. (n.d.). Human resources management – 2nd Ontario edition. Available at: https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/humanresourcesmanagementcandianed/.
  7. Kasmin, D. S. (2021). Rozvytok personalu yak neobkhidna umova rozvytku pidpryiemstva [Staff development as a necessary condition for enterprise development]. Innovative Solutions in Modern Science, no. 3(47), pp. 26–57. https://doi.org/10.26886/2414-634X.3(47)2021.2.
  8. Kavanagh, M. J., & Johnson, R. D. (Eds.). (n.d.). Human resource information systems. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 9781412991667.
  9. Luhova, V., Serikov, D., Liutviieva, Y., Serikova, T., & Kovalova, V. (2021). Directions to develop managerial competence in managers of different types. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, no. 43(2), pp. 269–275. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2021.23.
  10. Milner, B., Rapoport, V., & Yevenko, L. (1986). The management staff and rationalization of an enterprise. In Design of management systems in U.S.S.R. industry. Theory and Decision Library (vol. 48). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4626-2_3.
  11. Murphy, K. (2020). Performance evaluation will not die, but it should. Human Resource Management Journal, no. 30(1), pp. 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12259.
  12. The Balanced Scorecard Institute (BSI). (n.d.). Balanced scorecard overview. Available at: https://balancedscorecard.org/bsc-basics-overview/.
  13. Tweedie, D., Wild, D., Rhodes, C., & Martinov-Bennie, N. (2019). How does performance management affect workers? Beyond human resource management and its critique. International Journal of Management Reviews, no. 21(1), pp. 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12177.
  14. Vrontis, D., Christofi, M., Pereira, V., Tarba, S., Makrides, A., & Trichina, E. (2022). Artificial intelligence, robotics, advanced technologies and human resource management: A systematic review. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, no. 33(6), pp. 1237–1266. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1871398.
  15. Harvard Business Review. (2001). Getting 360-degree feedback right. Harvard Business Review. Available at: https://hbr.org/2001/01/getting-360-degree-feedback-right.

The article was received 28.07.2025

Quote article, APA style

Lebedynska Olena, Ivanisov Oleg, Achkasova Oksana. 28.07.2025 . Innovative technologies for assessing management performance in the conditions of the post-war economy. The journal "Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology". 2025 / #3. 56-61pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-3-9

Quote article, MLA style

Lebedynska Olena, Ivanisov Oleg, Achkasova Oksana. "Innovative technologies for assessing management performance in the conditions of the post-war economy". The journal "Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology". 28.07.2025 . https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-3-9

Quote article, translit