# 69 362-365 View full article

УДК: 338.432:005.591.6

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2026-1-69

Fedashko Taras,
Postgraduate student at the Department of Economics and Trade,
Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University,
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2130-173X

JEL classification: Q13, O33, R58, Q18

Published: 25.02.2026

The article demonstrates that the modern paradigm of agro-industrial enterprise development involves transforming it into a high-tech intellectual center based on the synergy of biotechnology, digital management, and big data. It is substantiated that the strategic competitiveness of the Ukrainian agro-industrial complex in the long term will depend on business entities’ ability to convert economic challenges into drivers of digital transformation. It is noted that the innovative and strategic orientations for the development of agro-industrial enterprises in the post-war period should be based not on the simple reproduction of lost capacities, but on the “build back better” principle. In the context of infrastructural destruction, not only the area of cultivated land but also the quality of digital data about it becomes a strategic asset. It has been proven that an enterprise’s ability to instantly adjust its production model to market dynamics becomes the main criterion for its viability. The cluster structuring of the agro-industrial sector enabled the substantiation of a differentiated approach to its post-war recovery, in which the effectiveness of strategies is determined by the convergence of enterprise development and the institutional environment. It is established that digitalization, greening, and deep processing constitute the universal core of innovations; however, the scale of their implementation and social impact depend on the specifics of a particular cluster. The industry’s gravitation toward an export-investment model is proven, requiring integration into global value chains and adaptation to EU standards. Successful transformation of agro-industrial enterprises requires implementing cluster-oriented policies, combining innovative business strategies with active state support in risk insurance and infrastructure development.

Keywords: development, agro-industrial enterprise, innovation-strategic benchmarks, post-war recovery, potential, innovations, cluster, production infrastructure.

Rеferences

  1. Boiko, L., & Boiko, V. (2023). Suchasnyi stan ahrobiznesu v Ukraini ta yoho revitalizatsiia u pisliavoiennyi period [Current state of agribusiness in Ukraine and its revitalization in the post-war period]. Tavriiskyi Naukovyi Visnyk, (16), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.32782/2708-0366/2023.16.7.
  2. Honcharenko, O. (2025). Hlobalnyi vymir sherynhovoi ekonomiky [Global dimension of the sharing economy]. Ius Modernum, (1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.31617/3.2025(138)02.
  3. Zhehus, O., & Davydenko, V. (2024). Stratehichni imperatyvy innovatsiinoho rozvytku ahrarnoho sektoru Ukrainy yak osnovy yoho rezylientnosti [Strategic imperatives of innovative development of the agricultural sector of Ukraine as the basis of its resilience]. Ekonomika ta Suspilstvo, (61). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-61-23.
  4. Lupenko, Yu. O., Malik, M. Yo., Shpykuliak, O. H., & et al. (2014). Innovatsiine zabezpechennia rozvytku silskoho hospodarstva Ukrainy: problemy ta perspektyvy: monohrafiia [Innovative support for the development of agriculture in Ukraine: problems and prospects: monograph]. NNTs «IAE». URL: http://elar.tsatu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/1027.
  5. Nehei, M. V., & Trofimtseva, O. V. (2022). Analiz funktsionuvannia ahrarnoho sektoru Ukrainy v umovakh viiny [Analysis of the functioning of the agricultural sector of Ukraine in the conditions of war]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu Imeni V. N. Karazina, (102), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.26565/2311-2379-2022-102-06.
  6. Prokopyshyn, O., Polehenka, M., & Zhydovska, N. (2023). Innovatsiini stratehii rozvytku ahrobiznesu Ukrainy v pisliavoiennyi period [Innovative strategies for the development of agribusiness in Ukraine in the post-war period]. Visnyk Lvivskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu Pryrodokorystuvannia, (30), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.31734/economics2023.30.033.
  7. Rahulych, O. Yu., & Zaitsev, O. H. (2019). Ekonomika spilnoho spozhyvannia: sutnist i tendentsii rozvytku [Sharing economy: essence and development trends]. Molodyi Vchenyi, (11). https://doi.org/10.32839/2304-5809/2019-11-75-128.
  8. Savytskyi, E. (2021). Suchasni realii innovatsiinoho rozvytku pidpryiemstv ahrobiznesu v Ukraini [Modern realities of innovative development of agribusiness enterprises in Ukraine]. Ekonomika ta Suspilstvo, (31). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-31-56.
  9. Khakhula, B. V. (2022). Innovatsii yak chynnyk pryskorennia naukovo-tekhnichnoho prohresu v ahrarnomu sektori Ukrainy [Innovations as a factor of acceleration of scientific and technical progress in the agricultural sector of Ukraine]. Ahrosvit, (9-10), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6792.2022.9-10.79.

Quote article, APA style

Fedashko T. Innovative and strategic guidelines for the development of agro-industrial enterprises in the post-war period. Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology. 2026. №1. 362-365 pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2026-1-69

Quote article, MLA style

Fedashko T. Innovative and strategic guidelines for the development of agro-industrial enterprises in the post-war period. Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2026-1-69