# 77 385-389 View full article

УДК: 330.341.1:658.15:005.332.1

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-3-77

Tsiupak Vasyl,
Research Fellow at the Livestock Farming Institute of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine,
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8427-8427

JEL classification: G32, M21, O33

The article is devoted to the theoretical substantiation and development of a holistic concept for the formation of the organizational and economic mechanism of enterprise value management (OEM EVM) amid the digital transformation and military challenges of 2024–2026. The study proves that in the modern paradigm of corporate governance, the category of value (Value-Based Management, VBM) is becoming the most adequate indicator of strategic efficiency, displacing traditional profitability metrics. It is substantiated that for Ukrainian enterprises, value management has become a key instrument for ensuring economic resilience and investment attractiveness during post-war recovery. The author proposes a two-level structure for the OEM EVM, which integrates an organizational subsystem (“soft” factors: culture, leadership, structure) and an economic subsystem (“hard” factors: valuation methods such as EVA, DCF, MDI-R, and a system of KPIs). Attention is paid to the implementation of the stakeholder approach through the SRPR model (Stakeholders-Resources-Processes-Results), which allows viewing value as the result of an equivalent resource exchange within a network of interested parties. It is established that satisfying the interests of personnel and society becomes the foundation for maximizing shareholder wealth in the long term. In the study, digitalization is defined as the architectural basis of the management mechanism. Based on mathematical modeling, a critical dependence of the added value of Ukrainian enterprises on the level of management ICT competencies and on e-commerce development is proven. It is revealed that the digital architecture of the OEM EVM enables real-time tracking of value drivers and adjustment of strategic development trajectories. The study concludes that the success of the management mechanism depends directly on the quality of “digital leadership” and the organization’s ability to overcome internal resistance to change by fostering an adaptive corporate culture.

Keywords: value-based management (VBM), organizational and economic mechanism, digital transformation, SRPR model, economic added value (EVA), stakeholders, resilience, intellectual capital, digital architectonics.

Rеferences

  1. Gaytán-Cortés, J. (2025). Evaluation of Companies: Theories, Process and Methods. Mercados y Negocios, 26, 123–138. https://doi.org/10.32870/myn.vi54.7821.
  2. Sytnyk, H., Vysochyn, I., Zhuk, T., Olesenko, I., & Stratiichuk, V. (2021). Enterprise value management based on the stakeholder approach. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(3), 356–372. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.29.
  3. Drucker, P. F. (2015). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Harper Business.
  4. Ackoff, R. (1970). Concept of Corporate Planning. New York: Wiley. Retrieved from https://ia800807.us.archive.org/33/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.138227/ 2015.138227.A-Concept-Of-Corporate-Planning.pdf.
  5. Newman, W. (n.d.). Administrative Action: The Techniques of Organization Management. NJ: Englewood Cliffs. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/administrativeac0000will_k5e2.
  6. Ansoff, I. (1977). The State of Practice Planning Systems. Sloan Management Review, 1–24.
  7. Thompson, A. A., & Strickland, A. J. (2020). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases. McGraw-Hill.
  8. Schwab, K. (2020). Why we need the “Davos Manifesto” for a better kind of capitalism. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/stories/ 2019/12/why-we-need-the-davos-manifesto-for-better-kind-of-capitalism/.
  9. Lihonenko, L. (2025). Vplyv tsyfrovizatsii na systemu upravlinnia rezultatyvnistiu pidpryiemstv ta formuvannia stratehii yikh diialnosti [The impact of digitalization on the performance management system of enterprises and the formation of their activity strategy]. Ekonomichnyi prostir – Economic Space, 199. https://doi.org/10.30838/EP.199.220-227 [in Ukrainian].
  10. Tsymbal, L., & Kalenyuk, I. (2023). DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE GLOBAL EDUCATION MARKET. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 9(5), 266-274. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2023-9-5-266-274.
  11. Pruzhansky, V. (2013). Decision Metric for Capital Budgeting: EVA vs DCF. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2321076.
  12. Hadjixenophontos, A., Christodoulou-Volos, C., & Kurz, J. F. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Business Valuation Methods: A Practical Examination Using Discounted Cash-Flow and Economic Value-Added Approaches. International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, 22(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.33094/ijaefa.v22i2.2296.
  13. Miciuła, I., Kadłubek, M., & Stępień, P. (2020). Modern Methods of Business Valuation—Case Study and New Concepts. Sustainability, 12(7), 2699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072699.
  14. KPMG International. (2024). Transforming the enterprise of the future. The new champions in a digital era. Retrieved from https://assets.kpmg.com/content/ dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2024/06/Transforming-the-enterprise-of-the-future.pdf.
  15. Sorokina, A., & Lebedeva, L. (2025). The impact of digital transformation on enterprises’ resilience: evidence from Ukraine. AGORA International Journal of Economical Science, 19(1), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.15837/aijes.v19i1.7161

The article was received 10.08.2025

Quote article, APA style

Tsiupak V. 10.08.2025 . Formation of the organizational and economic mechanism for corporate value management. Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology. 2025. №3. 385-389 pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-3-77

Quote article, MLA style

Tsiupak V. Formation of the organizational and economic mechanism for corporate value management. Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology. 10.08.2025 . https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-3-77