# 38 220-224 View full article

УДК 37.014.6:005.642.4

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2024-3-38

Potapiuk Iryna,
PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Management department named
after I.A. Markina, Poltava State Agrarian University,
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1051-0114
Yasnolob Ilona,
PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of department of Entrepreneurship and Law,
Poltava State Agrarian University,
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3826-8745

JEL classification: A20; I21

The research article is devoted to the theoretical aspects of ‘feedback’, particularly in the education system. The problems and prospects of applying feedback in the educational process are outlined. The features of feedback as a tool for managing the development of higher education institutions in today’s conditions are determined. It is emphasized that it is necessary to focus on organizational support for communication management in higher education institutions to develop higher education in Ukraine. It is noted that feedback is one of the most critical and widespread communication tools. It is determined that in managing the development of higher education institutions with the help of feedback, the following theses are achieved: improving the quality of the educational process, satisfaction of higher education students and research and teaching staff, optimization of management decisions, improvement of the communication process of all participants in the educational process, adaptation to changes, support for the development of research and teaching staff, promotion of innovation and development, planning and strategic development, improvement of student life. It is noted that the main tasks of feedback are helping to adapt faster, encouraging growth and development, and provoking changes to achieve the goals. Therefore, feedback is a tool for developing both the employee and the enterprise. The article identifies and characterizes the main types and kinds of feedback. The main types are positive, negative, and constructive feedback. For effective management of the development of higher education institutions, the most effective type of feedback is constructive. Attention is focused on the rules of constructive feedback. Attention is paid to the generally accepted and most optimal method of feedback – The Sandwich Method, which has both positive and negative aspects.

Keywords: feedback, types of feedback, management of development of higher education institutions, research and teaching staff, higher education students.

Rеferences

  1. Pronikov, O.K. (2021). «Management of institutions of higher education and its influence on the quality of students’ knowledge». Visnyk Natsional’noho universytetu «Chernihivs’kyj kolehium» imeni T.H. Shevchenka. Vol. 169 № 13. pp. 16-20.
  2. Haharin, M. (2023). «Management of the development of an educational institution». Umans’koho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu. Issue 2. рр. 138-144.
  3. Koval’chuk, M.V. (2023). «Organizational and financial support of the communication management strategy in higher education institutions». Modern problems of science, education and society. [Orhanizatsijne ta finansove zabezpechennia stratehii upravlinnia komunikatsiiamy u zakladakh vyschoi osvity]. the 6th International scientific and practical conference. SPC «Sciconf.com.ua». Kyiv. Ukraine.
  4. Metod sendvicha u zvorotnomu zv’iazku: chy varto nym korystuvatys’ u 2021 rotsi. Make it in Ukraine. [The sandwich method in feedback: should it be used in 2021]. Available at: https://www.makeitinua.com/posts-ua/the-feedback-sandwich-pros-and-cons-metod-sendvicha-u-zvorotnomu-zvyazku-chi-varto-nim-koristuvatis-u-2021-roci.
  5. Honcharova, O.A., Maslova, A.V. (2021). «Feedback in the education system: problems and prospects». Naukovyj chasopys NPU imeni M.P. Drahomanova. Seriia 5. Pedahohichni nauky: realii ta perspektyvy. Issue 83. рр. 42-46.
  6. Akkuzu, N. (2014). «The Role of Different Types of Feedback in the Reciprocal Interaction of Teaching Performance and Self-efficacy Belief». Australian Journal of Teacher Education. Vol. 39. № 3. рр. 36-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n3.3.
  7. Carless, D., Boud, D. (2018). «The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback». Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Vol. 43. № 8. рр. 1315-1325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
  8. Mandouit, L. (2018). «Using student feedback to improve teaching». Educational Action Research. Vol. 26. № 5. рр. 755-769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2018.1426470.
  9. Trubitsyna, O., Demchenko, V. (2020). «Management of institutions of higher education: application of innovations». Social work and education. №7 (3). рр. 383-393.

The article was received 18.07.2024

Quote article, APA style

Potapiuk Iryna, Yasnolob Ilona. 18.07.2024. Feedback as a tool for management of the development of higher education institutions in today’s conditions. The journal "Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology". 2024 / #3. 220-224pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2024-3-38

Quote article, MLA style

Potapiuk Iryna, Yasnolob Ilona. "Feedback as a tool for management of the development of higher education institutions in today’s conditions". The journal "Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology". 18.07.2024. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2024-3-38

Quote article, translit