# 114 619-624 View full article

УДК 005.52:005.334]:338.1

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2026-2-114

Selikhov Serhii,
Candidate of Sciences in Economics,
Livestock Farming Institute of National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine,
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4040-2235

JEL classification: Q15, Q18, G32, K23

The article provides a theoretical and scientific substantiation for classifying enterprise development management tools under the influence of post-industrial transformations, large-scale digitalization, and geopolitical instability. The study aims to develop a systematized classification-matrix model of methods and leverage factors that integrates external environmental turbulence and internal risk appetite levels to ensure the strategic resilience, agility, and economic security of business entities. The research uses the PESTEL methodology, D. Teece’s dynamic capabilities theory, the Risk Matrix method, and fuzzy inference systems to comprehensively evaluate complex uncertainty factors. The paper establishes a clear methodological distinction between the categories of “method,” “leverage,” and “tool,” eliminating chaos in constructing the organization’s economic mechanism. Three distinct environmental states are identified—stable, reactive, and turbulent—proving that high volatility requires a proactive model of interaction based on sensing, seizing, and transforming drivers. The primary contribution of the work is the design of a classification matrix that aligns conservative, adaptive, or proactive/aggressive risk appetite types with the level of environmental turbulence. Practical application of this matrix prevents companies from falling into “strategic paralysis” or experiencing financial overload. The study defines digital technologies and environmental ESG factors as modern growth catalysts. It demonstrates that business process digitalization enhances internal control quality and environmental transparency, enabling enterprises to safely increase their risk appetite for breakthrough innovations. Finally, the study proves that state support through stimulating tax levers, such as investment deductions and accelerated depreciation, lowers the break-even threshold for projects, paving the way for capacity modernization, adapting human resource policies to hybrid work, and strengthening long-term financial security.

Keywords: enterprise development, classification-matrix model, environmental turbulence, risk appetite, risk tolerance, economic security, dynamic capabilities, digitalization, ESG indicators, tax leverage.

Rеferences

  1. Illiashenko, S. M. (2006). Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsiinoho rozvytku [Marketing and management of innovative development]. Sumy: Universytetska Knyha.
  2. Illiashenko, S. M., et al. (2021). Perspektyvy i problemy innovatsiinoho rozvytku v umovakh chetvertoi promyslovoi revoliutsii [Prospects and problems of innovative development in the conditions of the fourth industrial revolution]. In O. D. Vytvytska (Ed.), Upravlinnia innovatsiinoiu diialnistiu: teoriia i praktyka: kol. monohrafiia [Management of innovative activity: theory and practice: collective monograph], chapter 1.7, pp. 112–131. Kyiv: Ahrar Media Hrup. Available at: https://repository.kpi.kharkov.ua/handle/KhPI-Press/54859.
  3. Vitlinskyi, V. V., Nakonechnyi, S. I., & Sharapov, O. D. (1996). Ekonomichnyi ryzyk ta metody ioho vymiriuvannia [Economic risk and methods of its measurement]. Kyiv: IZIN.
  4. Kozachenko, H. V., Ponomarov, V. P., & Liashenko, O. M. (2003). Ekonomichna bezpeka pidpryiemstva: sutnist ta mekhanizmy zabezpechennia: monohrafiia [Economic security of the enterprise: essence and mechanisms of assurance: monograph]. Kyiv: Libra.
  5. Arefieva, O. V., & Kuzenko, T. B. (2005). Planuvannia ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstv [Planning the economic security of enterprises]. Kyiv: Vyd-vo Evrop. Un-tu.
  6. Didyk, A. M. (2014). Ekonomichni vazheli vplyvu na diialnist pidpryiemstv: etymolohichnyi, semantychnyi ta typolohichnyi aspekty [Economic levers of influence on the enterprise activity: etymological, semantic and typological aspects]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho Universitetu Lvivska Politekhnika. Menedzhment ta Pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini: Etapy Stanovlennia i Problemy Rozvytku, no. 797, pp. 440–446. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VNULPM_2014_797_61.
  7. Pohorelov, Yu. S. (2017). Sposoby rozvytku pidpryiemstva: umovy ta rezultatyvnist vykorystannia [Ways of enterprise development: conditions and effectiveness of use]. Ekonomichnyi Zhurnal Odeskoho Politekhnichnoho Universitetu, no. 1(1), pp. 76–84. Available at: https://economics.op.edu.ua/ejopu/2017/No1/76.pdf.
  8. Mushnykova, S. A. (2019). Ryzyk-oriientovane myslennia yak bazysna osnova innovatsiinoi systemy upravlinnia bezpekoiu rozvytku pidpryiemstva [Risk-oriented thinking as a basic foundation of the innovativeness of enterprise development security management system]. Ekonomichnyi Visnyk, no. 4, pp. 93–101. https://doi.org/10.33271/ev/68.093.
  9. Vlasenko, T., & Revenko, O. (2023). Upravlinnia rozvytkom pidpryiemstva na osnovi kompleksnoi tekhnolohii: stratehichnyi ta innovatsiinyi aspekt [Enterprise development management based on complex technology: strategic and innovative aspect]. Development Service Industry Management, no. 4, pp. 16–20. https://doi.org/10.31891/dsim-2023-4(2).
  10. Kompanenko, M. I. (2025). Finansovi instrumenty ta vazheli rehuliuvannia zovnishnioekonomichnoi diialnosti ahrobiznesu v Ukraini [Financial instruments and levers for regulating foreign economic activity of agribusiness in Ukraine]. Aktualni Problemy Ekonomiky, vol. 287, no. 5, pp. 165–176. https://doi.org/10.32752/1993-6788-2025-1-287-165-176.
  11. Teece, D. J., & Augier, M. (2007). Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissions. Management International Review, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-007-0010-8.
  12. Henschel, T. (2006). Risk management practices in German SMEs: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2006.010543.
  13. Vynnyk, K. S. (2024). Teoretychni aspekty funktsionuvannia finansovoho mekhanizmu biznes-tsentriv [Theoretical aspects of business centers financial mechanism functioning]. Ekonomika i Upravlinnia, no. 1, pp. 115–124. https://doi.org/10.36919/2312-7872.1.2024.115.
  14. Larionova, K., & Kapinos, H. (2022). Mekhanizm upravlinnia prybutkom pidpryiemstva [The mechanism of enterprise profit management]. Modeling the Development of the Economic Systems, no. 1, pp. 120–128. https://doi.org/10.31891/mdes/2022-3-14.
  15. Fedulova, I., Makarchuk, I., & Hanushevych, V. (2022). Attributes of Formalisation Risk Culture and Its Typification in the Enterprise. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series Economics, no. 9, pp. 18–30. https://doi.org/10.52566/msu-econ.9(2).2022.18-30.

The article was received 31.05.2026

Quote article, APA style

Selikhov S. 31.05.2026. Enterprise development management in a turbulent environment: classification of methods and levers of influence. Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology. 2026. №2. 619-624 pp. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2026-2-114

Quote article, MLA style

Selikhov S. Enterprise development management in a turbulent environment: classification of methods and levers of influence. Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology. 31.05.2026. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2026-2-114