УДК 631.15:304.3:351.84

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2024-3-48

Ovadenko Viktoriia,
Postgraduate of Marketing and International Trade Department,
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine,
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2829-4616

JEL classification: M14; Q18

The research paper aims to substantiate the theoretical foundations of corporate social responsibility, determine its place and role in modern economic science, and analyze the features of corporate social responsibility in agribusiness. In the article, we used the abstract-logical method to identify the theoretical foundations of the development of corporate social responsibility in agribusiness. Additionally, we researched the evolution of management practice and various approaches to interpreting the concept of “corporate social responsibility” using a monographic approach. We also used the method of analysis and synthesis to identify the key characteristics of corporate social responsibility and to distinguish the levels of corporate social responsibility in agribusiness.   The article explores the development of “corporate social responsibility”. It defines a system of critical concepts, introductory provisions, and approaches that form the framework of corporate social responsibility. The concept of “corporate social responsibility” is theoretically interpreted and is commonly viewed as one of the elements of sustainable development. The article also discusses the specificities of using different approaches to interpret the concept of “corporate social responsibility” in management practice — elements of scientific novelty. A thorough analysis of the main characteristic features of corporate social responsibility was carried out, and the levels of corporate social responsibility in agribusiness were determined. The essential elements of internal and external corporate social responsibility in agrarian business were identified. Research has established that the most acceptable approach is that corporate social responsibility in agribusiness is considered the responsibility of an enterprise in the agrarian sector to its employees and other stakeholders (society, consumers, state authorities, public organizations, etc.), with which the organization interacts in the process own activity. The author has developed a mechanism for implementing the concept of corporate social responsibility in agribusiness. Practical relevance. Implementation of a mechanism for the implementation of social responsibility in agribusiness developed by the author in the activities of enterprises of the agrarian sector of the economy of Ukraine (based on the systematization of internal and external CSR with a division into reactive and strategic), which will contribute to the mitigation of already existing problems and negative consequences of the company’s activities and the successful implementation of the strategy CSR regarding the formation of a positive image of agrarian formations.

Keywords: social responsibility, corporate social responsibility, corporation, the concept of implementation of state policy in the sphere of promoting the development of socially responsible business in Ukraine, agribusiness, and the mechanism of implementation of the concept of CSR in agribusiness.

Rеferences

  1. Andriiash,, Verba, S. (2023). «Theoretical approaches to the essence of “corporate social responsibility”». Naukovi pratsi MAUP. Politychni nauky ta publichne upravlinnia. Issue 2 (68). рр. 1-5.
  2. Denysenko,, Zaiets’, T. (2012). «The impact of corporate social responsibility on corporate governance». Visnyk Khmel’nyts’koho natsional’noho universytetu. Ekonomichni nauky. № 5. Vol. 1. pp. 134-136.
  3. Kotler,, Li, N. (2005). Korporatyvna sotsial’na vidpovidal’nist’. Yak zrobyty iakomoha bil’she dobra dlia vashoi kompanii ta suspil’stva. [Corporate social responsibility. How to do as much good as possible for your company and society]. Kyiv. Ukraine.
  4. Mazurenko,, Zasenko, O. (2012). «Modern concept of corporate social responsibility in international business». Efektyvna ekonomika. № 6. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ efek.2012.6.7.
  5. Matvijchuk,, Tkach, K. (2016). «Genesis of concepts of corporate social responsibility». Visnyk Mukachivs’koho derzhavnoho universytetu. Issue 6. рр. 332-337.
  6. Kolot,M., Hrishnova, O.A. (2012). Sotsial’na vidpovidal’nist’: teoriia i praktyka rozvytku. [Social responsibility: theory and practice of development]. Kyiv. Ukraine.
  7. Business for Social Responsibility. Overview of Corporate Social Responsibility. (2003). Switzerland.
  8. Fukuyama, (2000). Social Capital and Civil Society. IMF Working Paper WP/00/74.
  9. Garriga,, Untangling, D. (2004). «The Jungle of Corporate Social Responsibility Theories». Journal of Business Ethics. рр.51-71.
  10. Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Green Paper. European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment and Social Affairs Unit EMPL. (2001).
  11. Simon,, Sabapathy, J., Dossing, N., Swift, T. (2003). Responsible Competitiveness. Corporate Responsibility Clusters in Action.
  12. The Challenges of Corporate Social Responsibility. Towards Constructive Partnership. The Phillip Morris Institute for Public Policy Research ASBL. (2000). Brussels.
  13. Porter,, Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy and Society: the Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibilityiu Harvard Business Review. рр. 1-13.
  14. Bojko, (2022). Sotsial’na vidpovidal’nist’ biznesu u period voiennoho stanu. [Social responsibility of business during martial law]. Available at: https://eba.com.ua/sotsialna-vidpovidalnist-biznesu-u-period-voyennogo-stanu/.
  15. Khrystenko,, Zhartovska, V. (2019). «Social responsibility in enterprise personnel management: realities of time». Naukovyj zhurnal Ekonomika i rehiony. Vol. 4(75). рр. 113-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2019.4(75).1859.
  16. Natsional’nyj standart Ukrainy. «Nastanovy schodo sotsial’noi vidpovidal’nosti». DSTU ISO 26000:2019. Nakaz. (2020). [National standard of Ukraine. “Guidelines on social responsibility”. DSTU ISO 26000:2019. Order]. № 523 dated December 29, 2020.
  17. Red’kina,S. (2011). Korporatyvna sotsial’na vidpovidal’nist’: modeli ta upravlins’ka praktyka. [Corporate social responsibility: models and managerial practice]. Vyd-vo «Farbovanyj lyst». Kyiv. Ukraine.
  18. Caroll,B. (1999). «Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of Definitional Construct». Business and Society. Vol. 38. рр. 268-295.

Koval’, O.P. (2023). Korporatyvna sotsial’na vidpovidal’nist’ pid chas vijny ta v povoiennomu vidnovlenni. [Corporate social responsibility during the war and in post-war reconstruction]. Tsentr ek. i sots. doslidzhen’. Kyiv. Ukraine

The article was received 20.07.2024