УДК 338.439:656.025:004

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-2-41

Shepelev Volodymyr,
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Director,
Margonika Transportation LLC, Tampa,
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1551-9687
Vdovenko Nataliia,
Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department Faculty of Economics,
Department of Global Economy,
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0849-057X

JEL classification: L90; N70; R40

The article emphasizes the prospects for enhancing the agricultural sector’s efficiency through infrastructure modernization, balanced development of logistics systems, expansion of multimodal transportation, introducing digital technologies at the regional level, and establishing interaction among all participants in the transport and logistics chain. The analysis makes it possible to assert that the digitalization of logistics processes, particularly the implementation of transport monitoring systems, predictive planning, load analytics, and route optimization, can significantly increase the delivery efficiency index and improve the fundamental elements of agricultural transport services’ organizational and economic mechanism. It is reasonable to consider that, under current conditions, a key component of the modern organizational and economic mechanism is the system of public regulation, which ensures equal access for agricultural producers to transport services, contributes to rural infrastructure development, stimulates investment in logistics hubs, and supports innovative solutions. There are grounds to state that integrating logistics services within public support programs for agriculture requires alignment with spatial development forecasts and state-level strategies. In this context, implementing public-private partnership mechanisms is a critical factor, as it facilitates the mobilization of additional financial resources and managerial expertise for developing transport infrastructure in the agricultural sector. The presented data indicates that digitalizing logistics processes such as electronic document management, real-time transport monitoring systems, and automated supply chain management—has become a key factor in enhancing transparency, responsiveness, and operational efficiency within logistics systems. The arguments provided lead to the conclusion that digital technologies optimize costs and enable a new quality of institutional interaction, automation of control, and trust among all logistics stakeholders. There are objective grounds to conclude that agricultural transport provision’s modern organizational and economic mechanism cannot function effectively without a digital component, ensuring flexibility, adaptability, and strategic resilience in a rapidly changing environment.

Keywords: digitalization, organizational and economic mechanism, challenges, regulatory instruments, forecasting, innovations, transport services, agricultural products, infrastructure, transport system, sector, regulatory mechanism, multimodal transportation, production efficiency, logistics, competitiveness, extraordinary challenges, agriculture.

Rеferences

1. Havrylenko, N. H., & Tarasenko, I. O. (2021). Suchasni tendentsii tsyfrovizatsii ekonomiky: problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Modern trends in the digitalization of the economy: problems and development prospects]. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky, no. 3(47), vol. 1, pp. 36–46. https://doi.org/10.25313/2520-2294-2021-3-7046.
2. Bashlai, S., & Yaremko, I. (2023). Tsyfrovyzatsiia ekonomiky Ukrainy v umovakh yevrointehratsiinykh protsesiv [Digitalization of Ukraine’s economy in the context of European integration]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, no. 48. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-48-48.
3. Vdovenko, N. M., Korobova, N. M., & Yatsun, A. H. (2024). Pidkhody do formuvannia ekonomichnoi bezpeky mashynobudivnoho kompleksu Ukrainy ta zarubizhnykh krain v aspekti mizhnarodnoi ekonomichnoi diialnosti [Approaches to shaping economic security of Ukraine’s and foreign engineering industry in the context of international economic activity]. Ukrainskyi zhurnal prykladnoi ekonomiky ta tekhniky, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 316–320. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2024-3-56.
4. Nahirna, M. Ia. (2023). Osoblyvosti vplyvu tsyfrovizuvannia na rozvytok zovnishnoekonomichnoi diialnosti pidpryiemstv v umovakh viiny ta pisliavoiennyi period: planovyi aspekt [Impact of digitalization on foreign economic activity during war and post-war recovery: planning aspect]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, no. 54. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-54-28.
5. Vdovenko, N. M. (2024). Evoliutsiia teoretychnykh pidkhodiv do formuvannia derzhavnoi polityky zabezpechennia ekonomichnoi bezpeky mashynobudivnoho kompleksu krainy [Evolution of theoretical approaches to the formation of state policy on ensuring economic security in engineering]. Aktualni pytannia u suchasnii nautsi, no. 11(29), pp. 61–72. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6300-2024-11(29)-61-72.
6. Hamova, I. V., & Suslova, T. O. (2022). Innovatsii yak draiver rozvytku ekosystemy v umovakh tsyfrovoi ekonomiky [Innovations as a driver for ecosystem development under the digital economy]. Naukovi zapysky Lvivskoho universytetu biznesu ta prava. Seriia ekonomichna. Seriia yurydychna, no. 34, pp. 126–134. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7198626.
7. Vdovenko, N. M., Sharylo, Yu. Ye., Margasova, V. H., & Korobova, N. M. (2024). Bazovi pidkhody derzhavnoi polityky zabezpechennia ekonomichnoi bezpeky mashynobudivnoho kompleksu z oriientatsiieiu na silskohospodarske mashynobuduvannia ta blakytnu ekonomiku [Basic approaches of state policy to ensure the economic security of engineering with focus on agricultural engineering and the blue economy]. Natsionalni interesy Ukrainy, no. 4(4), pp. 15–21. https://doi.org/10.52058/3041-1793-2024-4(4)-14-21.
8. Voloshko, T., Tatsenko, O., & Solariov, O. (2022). Pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti vykorystannia transportnykh zasobiv dlia ahrarnoho vyrobnytstva [Improving the efficiency of the use of vehicles for agricultural production]. Visnyk Pryazovskoho Derzhavnoho Tekhnichnoho Universytetu, no. 45, pp. 135–142. https://doi.org/10.31498/2225-6733.45.2022.276274.
9. Aulin, V. V., Hryn’kiv, A. V., Lysenko, S. V., Lievytskyi, O. M., Chernai, A. Ye., Holub, D. V., & Holovaty, A. O. (2021). Teoretychne obgruntuvannia upravlinnia funktsionuvanniam tekhnichnymy ta transportnymy systemamy na osnovi metodiv systemnoi teorii informatsii [Theoretical substantiation of managing technical and transport systems using methods of systems information theory]. Tsentralnoukrainskyi naukovyi visnyk. Tekhnichni nauky, no. 4(35), pp. 178–189.
10. Peshko, M., & Zaverbnyi, A. (2023). Didzhytalizatsiia ukrainskoi ekonomiky v umovakh yevrointehratsii [Digitalization of the Ukrainian economy in the context of European integration]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, no. 47. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-47-56.
11. Voronenko, V. I., et al. (2025). Tsyfrovi transformatsii dlia zabezpechennia ekoloho-ekonomichnoho rozvytku ta tsyvilnoho zakhystu: monohrafiia [Digital transformations to ensure ecological-economic development and civil protection: monograph] (O. V. Kubatko & V. I. Voronenko, Eds.). Sumy: SumDU. 195 p.

The article was received 29.04.2025