УДК: 330.1

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2021-2-24

Lilia Kruhovec-Homiak
Graduate student of West Ukrainian National University

JEL classification: F60; O15


Introduction. The worldview system of society, the development of personal and the formation of collective intelligence are considered in terms of economics, as this system has an economic component, the elements of which have an impact on human lives. Problems of scientific research on the interaction of socio-economic phenomena and worldview, their impact on the intellectual development of the individual and society are on the agenda of modern science.

The purpose of the article is to study the issues related to the influence of economic components on the formation of the modern society worldview. The topic is relevant due to the objectivity of the processes of interaction at the level of personal and collective intelligence, which generate it in the conditions of transitivity and globalization of the domestic economy.

Results. An analysis of the definition of personal and collective intelligence was provided in the context of social theories of development and global economic processes. The properties of intelligence, the specifics of its functioning in a transitive society are determined. The main stages of socio-economic development of society are considered and their main features are determined. The knowledge economy is considered in detail as a modern trend of society, in which intangible resources become a major factor in the integration of science, education and entrepreneurship for further development of production, including intellectual business, and provide conditions for sustainable innovative economic growth.

Conclusions. Based on the review of theories of post-industrialism, postmodernism and information society, the common features and tendencies of society development are outlined. Intensive development of the information society, the state program of introduction of new modern tendencies in education through realization of the concept of New Ukrainian school, participation in the international projects on sustainable development, decentralization of the power on places, realization of programs on media literacy and development of socially-oriented and intellectual intelligent business prove the transitivity of Ukrainian society, but also determine the diverse impact of global development trends in the context of globalization.

Keywords: intelligence, personal intelligence, collective intelligence, social intelligence, innovation, knowledge economy, transitive society.


  1. Irtyscheva, I. O., Smelianets’, T. V., Burdel’na, H. O. (2012). «The state and strategic guidelines of investment and financial support of the agri-food sector in the context of globalization». Ahrosvit. № 7, рр. 26–32.
  2. Bell, D. (2009). Nastannia postindustrial’noho suspil’stva. Filosofiia: khrestomatiia (vid vytokiv do s’ohodennia). [The onset of post-industrial society. Philosophy: textbook (from the origins to the present)]. NAN Ukrainy L.V. Hubers’koho. Znannia. Kyiv, рр. 419-431.
  3. Vernadskij, V. I. (1944). «A few words about the noosphere». Uspehi sovremennoj biologii. № 18, Issue 2, pp.113–120. Available at: http://vernadsky.lib.ru.
  4. Dziuba, I. (1998). «Ideological decibels of “dialogue of cultures”». Zbirka naukovykh prats’ ukrains’ko-rosijs’ki vidnosyny: humanitarnyj vymir. Lohos. Kyiv. Ukraine.
  5. Kanygin, Ju. M. (1993). Osnovy kognitivnogo obshhestvoznanija (informacionnaja teorija social’nyh sistem). [Fundamentals of cognitive social science (information theory of social systems)]. Ukrainskaja akademija informatiki. Kyiv. Ukraine.
  6. Lajon, D. (1996). «Information society: problems and illusions. Information, ideology and utopia». Suchasna zarubizhna sotsial’na filosofiia. рр. 362-380. Kyiv. Ukraine.
  7. Lebedeva, L.V. (2016). «Evolution of theories of post-industrial society». Ekonomichnyj chasopys. №2, рр.13-18. Available at: https://echas.vnu.edu.ua/index.php/echas/article/download/230/186/
  8. Mahlup, F. (1966). Proizvodstvo i rasprostranenie znanij v SShA. [Production and dissemination of knowledge in the United States]. Progress. Moscow. Russia. («The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States»).
  9. Ordenov, S.S. (2019). «Social liminality as a stationary state of transitive societies of the globalized world». Visnyk Natsional’noho aviatsijnoho universytetu. Seriia: Filosofiia. Kul’turolohiia. Vol. 29, № 1. pp. 55-66. Available at: http://jrnl.nau.edu.ua/index.php/VisnikPK/article/view/316.32%20%28045%29
  10. Popper, Karl (1992). Otkrytoe obshhestvo i ego vragi. tom І. Chary Platona. Perevod vypolnen s pjatogo izdanija 1966 goda (reprint 1986 goda). [Open Society and its enemies. volume I. Charms of Plato. The translation is made from the fifth edition of 1966 (reprint of 1986)]. Jelektronnaja publikacija: Centr gumanitarnyh tehnologij. 20.12.2009. Moscow. Russia. Available at: https://gtmarket.ru/library/basis/3912/3915
  11. Rak, N.Ye. (2009). «Knowledge economy: essence and factors of knowledge management». Rehional’na ekonomika. № 3, рр. 224-232. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/regek_2009_3_30
  12. Rozumnyj, M. (2004). «Social ideas and modern mechanisms of communication». Politychnyj menedzhment. № 6, рр. 32-37. Available at: http://dspace.nbuv.g http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/11580ov.ua/handle/123456789/11580
  13. Stoianenko, I. V. (2012). Formuvannia ekonomiky znan’ iak real’nist’ ta neobkhidnist’ s’ohodennia. [Formation of the knowledge economy as a reality and necessity of today]. Efekty`vna ekonomika. [Effective economy]. (electronic journal). № 6. Available at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=1230
  14. Semenova, R. O. (2011). Intelekt. Entsyklopediia Suchasnoi Ukrainy: elektronna versiia. [Intellect. Encyclopedia of Modern Ukraine: electronic version]. In Dziuba, I.M., Zhukovs’kyj, A.I., Zhelezniak, M.H. and others; NAN Ukrainy, NTSh. Instytut entsyklopedychnykh doslidzhen’ NAN Ukrainy. Kyiv. Ukraine. Available at: http://esu.com.ua/search_articles.php?id=12386
  15. Sobko, O. M. (2016). Intelektual’nyj kapital i kreatsiia vartosti pidpryiemstva. [Intellectual capital and the creation of enterprise value]. TNEU. Ternopil. Ukraine.
  16. Toffler, E. (2000). Tretia Khvylia. [The Third Wave]. Translated by and in per. Yevsa, A. (ed.). Vyd. dim «Vsesvit». Kyiv. Ukraine.
  17. Fedulova, L. I. (2009). Ekonomika znan’. [Economics of knowledge]. NAN Ukrainy. In-t ekon. ta prohnozuv. NAN Ukrainy. Kyiv. Ukraine.
  18. Filosofs’kyj entsyklopedychnyj slovnyk. [Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary]. Available at: https://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Shynkaruk_Volodymyr/Filosofskyi_entsyklopedychnyi_slovnyk.pdf
  19. Chernysh, N. (1996). Sotsiolohiia. Kurs lektsij. [Sociology. Course of lectures]. Available at: https://osvita.ua/vnz/reports/sociology/12443
  20. Jakushek, V. (1992). Sovremennoe gosudarstvo perehodnogo tipa (teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie aspekty). [Modern state of transition (theoretical and methodological aspects)]. D. Sc. Thesis. Akademija nauk Ukrainy, Institut gosudarstva i prava im. V.M. Koreckogo. Kiev. Ukraine.

The article was received 23.04.2021