УДК: 332.01

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2021-2-12

Nazariy Popadynets
PhD of Economics, Senior Researcher of Department of Regional Economic Policy at
M. I. Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine
Roman Zhebchuk
PhD of Economics, Lecturer of Finance and Credit Chair,
Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

JEL classification: D33; E64; G18


Introduction. Today, in the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic, a number of economic problems have arisen in the country, which can be prevented by improving revenue policy. As the revenue part is formed in the current conditions of the budget decentralization reforms, the risks arising during the pandemic have become an important challenge for the entire economic system of the state and each territorial community in particular.

The purpose of the article is to highlight current issues of state regulation of the domestic economy related to global economic challenges and fiscal risk management caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results. The high dependence of budget revenues on tax and debt policies, the growth of their role in the economic downturn are analyzed. Emphasis is placed on the need and importance of developing tactics and strategies for budget and tax policies, as well as the possibility of their flexible change in the face of unpredictable economic downturns. The need for state revenue policy to take into account fiscal incentives and fiscal decentralization is indicated. Particular attention is paid to the opportunities and threats posed by the deepening of decentralization processes in Ukraine, emphasis is placed on the components of the financial capacity of local communities and the adequacy of financial resources. It was mentioned that the territorial redistribution of funds must take into account the requirements of the most rational allocation of productive forces, promote business, resolve conflicts that arise in the process of balancing budget revenues and constitutional social obligations. Processes of decentralization of budgetary and tax relations should be accompanied by strengthening of their social orientation. It is noted that the financial literacy of the population plays a significant role in reducing the level of emotional turmoil during economic downturns. At the same time, the study proposed a hypothesis for further research about the dependence of the effectiveness of decentralization policy on the use of modern approaches to financial management at the regional level, which require the implementation of innovative regulatory levers for change management.

Conclusions. A number of conclusions and recommendations were formulated. In particular, it is proposed to implement a number of measures to identify and counter the risks of destabilization as a basis for ensuring the financial and economic security of the state. The need to further improvement of the institutional coordination of the application of regional regulatory fiscal instruments and mechanisms with national and international norms and rules was emphasized. It was noted that in the conditions of quarantine restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the implementation of a set of measures of tax and budget support for citizens, small and medium businesses should be carried out in accordance with a clearly defined and approved program.

Keywords: fiscal policy, budget policy, consequences of COVID-19, decentralization, public finance, financial literacy.


  1. Official site of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. Available at: https://mof.gov.ua/en
  2. Ivanytska O., Koschuk, T. (2020). «Fiscal risk management in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic». Finance of Ukraine, vol. 7, pp. 47–61.
  3. Voznyak, H., Panukhnyk, O., Khymych, H., Popadynets, N. (2019). Development of regional economic systems under the impact of financial decentralization: display, challenges and new opportunities. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research. Proceedings of the 2019 7th International Conference on Modeling, Development and Strategic Management of Economic System (MDSMES 2019). pp. 121-126. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2991/mdsmes-19.2019.24
  4. Andersen, T. M. (2012). Fiscal sustainability and fiscal policy targets. Economics Working Papers, 15. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3980/92720fb3d0c22e0e20a99c480962f15a30c7.pdf
  5. Oleksyuk, H., Popadynets, N., Lysyak, N. (2020). Олексюк Г.В., Попадинець Н.М., Лисяк Н.М. Conceptual Financial-Economic Model of Urban Systems. Economics and Law. 2 (57). С. 84-95.
  6. Balassone, F., Langenus, G., Manzke, B., Manzke, B., Pavot, J., Prammer, D. et al. (2009). Fiscal sustainability and policy implications for the euro area. ECB Working Paper, vol. 994, pp. 1–44. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1684453
  7. Patytska, K., Panukhnyk, O., Popadynets, N., Kramarenko, I. (2021). Forming the Territorial Communities’ Local Budgets in Ukraine Under Decentralization: Current Condition and Management Tasks. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 2021. №14(2), pp. 23-30. 10.22094/joie.2020.677868
  8. Burnside, C. (Ed.). (2005). Fiscal sustainability in theory and practice (a handbook). Washington, D. C.: World Bank. DOI:10.1596/978-0-8213-5874-0
  9. Siryk, Z., Popadynets, N, Pityulich, M., Chakii, O., Irtyshcheva, I., Panukhnyk, O., Hyk, V., Fedotova, Y., Rohozian,Y., Lysyak, N. (2021). Decentralization of local self-government under the conditions of administrative-territorial reform in Ukraine. 2021. №7(4). Pp. 781–790, doi: 10.5267/j.ac.2021.2.006
  10. Bi, H. (2017). Fiscal Sustainability: A Cross-Country Analysis. Economic Review, Q IV, pp. 5–35. Available at: https://www.kansascityfed.org/~/media/files/publicat/econrev/econrevarchive/2017/4q17bi.pdf
  11. (2016, June). Analyzing and Managing Fiscal Risks – Best Practices. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2016/050416.pdf
  12. Iefymenko, T., Hasanov, S., Bartosh, S. (2020). Fiscal security and decentralization in the face of global challenges and threats. Finance of Ukraine, vol. 9, pp. 29–48.
  13. De Tocqueville, A. (1984). Democracy in America. New York: Penguin Books, USA Inc.
  14. Tiebout, С. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 64 (5), pp. 416–424. DOI: 10.1086/257839
  15. Oates, W. E. (Ed.). (1998). Federalism and Government Finance. Economics of Fiscal Federalism and Local Finance. Cheltenham, U.K.: An Elgar Reference Collection.
  16. Official site of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Available at: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/
  17. (2019, June). Financial literacy, financial inclusion and financial well-being of Ukraine. Available at: https://www.slideshare.net/sadovnychyi/ss-148924891?ref=https://finclub.net/news/finansovaya-gramotnost-ukraintsev-okazalas-khudshej-v-oesr.html
  18. Quarantine in Ukraine: When people run out of money – a survey. (2020, March 25). ZIK. Available at: https://zik.ua/news/ludyna/karantyn_v_ukraini_koly_v_liudei_zakinchatsia_hroshi_opytuvannia_963298
  19. Mihailishina, D. (2019, June 22). Living within our means. Ukrainians do not save – what to do about it? Available at: https://finance.liga.net/ekonomika/opinion/jit-po-sredstvam-ukraintsyne-ekonomyat—chto-s-etim-delat
  20. Zaharchenko, N. (2020) Financial inclusion to improve the welfare of the population and economic growth of the state. Finance of Ukraine, vol. 6, pp. 105–116.
  21. Brueckner, J. K. (2000). Fiscal Decentralization in Developing Countries: The Effect of Local Corruption and Tax Evasion. Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 1(1), pp. 1–18.
  22. McConnell, C. R., Brue, S. L. (1990). Economics: Principles, problems and policies. New York: McGraw-Hill.

The article was received 10.05.2021