УДК: 631:331.522.4

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2021-3-34

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Professor of the Department of Enterprise Economics, Mykolayiv National Agrarian University
Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Department of Economic Theory and Social Sciences, Mykolayiv National Agrarian University
Doctor of Economics, Professor, Professor of Accounting and Taxation Department
Mykolayiv National Agrarian University

JEL classification: O18; P25; R11


The article examines the interpretation of the concept of rural areas by different researchers. It was found that the most frequently used characteristics, which are taken as the basis of the content of the category “rural areas” are the spatial location of the agricultural sector of production and the attached administrative-territorial status. It is proposed to define “rural areas” as settlements with a population density of less than 300 people per 1 km2. Summarizing the approaches of domestic researchers and considering our vision of certain aspects of formation, use and reproduction, the resource potential of rural areas is the actual and potential set of natural, demographic, tourist, recreational and industrial resources owned and / or used by rural communities, territories of the country and its separate regions. The role and place of rural areas in the system of socio-economic development of the state and regions are analyzed. Thus, the most important social institutions that determine the dominant forms and directions of rural development are the state, represented by central and local authorities. The institute of the state formulates the general rules of the game in the form of relevant regulations, acts as an arbitrator and provides financial support for the production and infrastructure components of the agricultural economy. The process of qualitative changes in the agricultural sector of the national economy, in land reform and decentralization reform, has logically reached the stage of institutionalization of the Ukrainian peasantry, which loses its discriminatory role in agricultural production and country territories. The latter have the resource potential, which under appropriate conditions can be used equally effectively in both agricultural and non-agricultural spheres of production. At the same time, the need to move to the principles of sustainable development, allows to consider the natural resources of rural areas as a value.

Key words: rural areas, socio-economic development, state, region.


  1. Kosodij, R. P. (2009). «Problems of rural development in the context of globalization». Ekonomika APK. № 4, рр. 132-138.
  2. OECD (1996a) Better Policies for Rural Development (Paris: OECD).
  3. Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panelon Climate Change 2014. [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY. USA. pp. 613-657.
  4. Mel’nyk, S. I. (2004). Sotsial’no-ekonomichni problemy vidtvorennia ta efektyvnoho vykorystannia resursnoho potentsialu sela. [Socio-economic problems of reproduction and effective use of resource potential of the village]. NNTs IAE. Кyiv. Ukraine.
  5. Trehobchuk, V. M. (2005). «Actual problems of sustainable development of rural areas». Sotsial’no-ekonomichni problemy rozvytku ukrains’koho sela i sil’s’kykh terytorij. [Socio-economic problems of development of the Ukrainian village and rural areas]. Proceeding of the Meeting of the All-Ukrainian Congress of Agricultural Economists, Kyiv, November 9-10, рр. 69-76.
  6. Pavlov, O. I. (2006). Sil’s’ki terytorii Ukrainy: istorychna transformatsiia paradyhmy upravlinnia. [Rural territories of Ukraine: historical transformation of the management paradigm]. Astroprynt. Odesa. Ukraine.
  7. Prokopa, I. V. (2007). «Rural areas of Ukraine: research and regulation of development». Ekonomika Ukrainy. № 6, рр. 50-59.
  8. Yakuba, K. I. (2007). «Labor potential of rural areas». Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky. № 6, рр. 72-75.
  9. Fil’tenshtejn, L.M. (2010). Sotsial’no-ekonomichnyj rozvytok sil’s’kykh rehioniv Ukrainy. [Socio-economic development of rural regions of Ukraine]. Abstract of Ph.D. Thesis. 08.00.04. Zaporizhzhia.
  10. Bulavka, O. H. (2016). «Theoretical and methodological and organizational foundations of rural development». Ekonomika APK. №6, рр. 104-109.
  11. Mohyl’nyj O. (2008). «Realities and paradoxes of agrarian policy». Ekonomika Ukrainy. № 12, рр. 41.

The article was received 25.07.2021