УДК: 658.012: 339.13

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2022-4-24

Kolesnyk Maksym,
National Aviation University,
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0814-4220

JEL classification: H54; O18

The article considers the essence, properties, and task of market infrastructure, including the disconnection of scientific research on individual infrastructures. Monitoring of these studies highlights the tendency to a limited analysis of the reasons for the fragmentation of infrastructures. The essence of this limitation is that the subject of research is usually a separate infrastructure, such as innovation, market, technological, social, digital, etc. Enrichment of the arsenal of infrastructure management methods through comparative analysis procedures, in accordance with the tasks of science and methodology development, allows achieving an increase in the efficiency of both the management itself and the economic mechanism of infrastructure. As a result, stand-alone infrastructure is viewed through the prism of understanding the systemic properties of this phenomenon, identifying characteristic, and added properties, constant and variable system parameters. The systemic approach, as well as the holistic approach, in this case focuses the search, first, on identifying the links that provide a holistic vision of infrastructure as a single system characterized by its essence and various forms of its manifestation. In our opinion, enriching the lexicon of national science with the term “market infrastructure” in the early stages of transformation practice and scientific understanding of the transition economy positively allowed to track new patterns of formation of the market economy in Ukraine. The separation of the concepts of economic “infrastructure” and “market infrastructure” is still perceived by many domestic scientists as different categories, but this approach is not observed in world science, since the processes of development of leading market economies and science in these countries occurred simultaneously and evolutionarily. This statement does not refute the rationality of using the concept of “market infrastructure” as a category, but it defines the purpose of this article as the search for and establishment of “points of contact” between infrastructures to describe this phenomenon systematically. To this purpose, the article considers scientific approaches to defining the essence of infrastructure, the state of infrastructure typology, states the relevant definition of the systemic essence of infrastructure, and substantiates a scientific approach to the comparative analysis of the search for “points of contact” as links of integration. Based on the results of the study conducted in this article, the author also identifies the components of the infrastructure development process characteristic of infrastructure. Directions for further research are proposed.

Keywords: economic infrastructure, market infrastructure, innovative infrastructure, system approach, holistic approach, infrastructure functions, sustainable development

Rеferences

1. Zhavoronkova, G.V., Melnyk, L.Y. (2018). «Modern orientation of the methodology of scientific research in the study of the formation of the knowledge economy in the information society». Ekonomika ta derzhava. № 2, pp. 16-21. Available at: http://www.economy.in.ua/pdf/2_2018/6.pdf.
2. Atamas, O.P. (2012). «Theoretical substantiation and practice of applying the term “infrastructure” in economic research». Yevropejs’kyj vektor ekonomichnoho rozvytku. № 1 (12), рр. 10-15. Available at: https://eurodev.duan.edu.ua/images/PDF/Full_issues/Issues/1_12_2012.pdf#page=10.
3. Website. Available at: http://sewiki.ru/Холизм.
4. Sadchykova, I. (2020). «Conceptual provisions for substantiating the essence of the category “infrastructure”». Problemy i perspektyvy ekonomiky ta upravlinnia. № 4(24), рр. 155-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25140/2411-5215-2020-4(24)-155-169%20
5. Khadzhinov, I.V. Metodolohichni osoblyvosti vyvchennya ponyattya «infrastruktura» ta yiyi funktsiy. [Methodological features of studying the concept of “infrastructure” and its functions]. Available at: https://ela.kpi.ua/bitstream/123456789/10629/1/9.pdf
6. Walter Buhr What is infrastructure? Available at: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/siesiegen/107-03.htm
7. Rekunenko, I. I. (2011). «Role and place of market infrastructure in a market economy». Visnyk Ukrains’koi akademii bankivs’koi spravy. No. 2, рр. 20-24.
8. Vasilyuk O.V. (2019). «Features of the development of the infrastructure complex in the conditions of the socio-economic system of the region». Problemy systemnoho pidkhodu v ekonomitsi. Issue 2(2), рр. 44-48. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/PSPE_print_2019_2%282%29__9
9. Portugal-Perez, A., Wilson, J. S. (2010). Export Performance and Trade Facilitation Reform: Hard and Soft Infrastructure. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5261, Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1585040
10. Anzhelika Livitska Obʺyekty krytychnoyi infrastruktury: yak vyznachyty? [Critical Infrastructure Objects: How to Define?]. Available at: https://radnuk.com.ua/voiennyj-stan/ob-iekty-krytychnoi-infrastruktury-iak-vyznachyty/
11. Shulskyi, M. (2019). Management functions: their unity and interdependence in the processes of activity. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series Economical Sciences, 21(93), pp. 58-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet-e9312
12. Akhtaryeva L. G. (2008). System modernization of the regional market infrastructure [Systemic modernization of the regional market infrastructure], Problemy sovremennoj ekonomyky. N 3 (27). Available at: http://www.m-economy.ru/art.php?nArtId=2137
13. Ponjatie, priznaki i funkcii rynochnoj infrastruktury. [The concept, attributes and functions of the market infrastructure]. Available at: http://newinspire.ru/lektsii-po-gosregulirovaniiuekonomiki/ponyatie-priznaki-i-funktsii-rinochnoy-infrastrukturi-2505
14. Velichko, G.V. Elementy ta skladovi innovatsiynoyi infrastruktury. [Elements and components of innovation infrastructure]. Available at: http://www.spilnota.net.ua/ua/article/id-2296/
15. Prigozhin A.I. (2003). Methods of development of organizations. ICFER.
16. Optner Stanford L. (1969). System Analysis for Solving Business and Industrial Problems. Soviet Radio.

The article was received 27.11.2022