# 57 334-339 View full article

УДК: 330.341:338.23:330.341

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2024-2-57

Petrenko Dmytro,
Graduate Student,
Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics,
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6001-5349

JEL classification: O 15, Q 32

The article is devoted to studying the strategy of inclusive development as an essential tool for reducing the differentiation of incomes of the population of Ukraine. The article aims to identify socio-economic trends and conditions for the economic development of the national economy to reveal the most critical imbalances and problems, the elimination of which is a prerequisite for further development. Research methods. To achieve this goal, statistical methods were used, particularly the method of secondary grouping and the method of coefficients. Results. Based on the study, it has been determined that a characteristic feature of economic growth in Ukraine is a low share of labor costs in the growth of sold products. According to calculations, the share of wages in the growth of sales products of the processing industry in 2022 was 5.2%, construction ― 6.3%, and trade ― 3.1%. A negative trend was observed in agriculture. In 2019, About 26% of the total increase in sales was used for remuneration of labor, while in 2022, it decreased to 1.6%. Thus, economic development in Ukraine is characterized by a low share of wages in the growth of sold products. Inclusive development is based on the transformation of distributive processes related to income formation, distribution, and redistribution between population segments.

The research has significant implications, as it has been determined that the decrease in the number of the population receiving total equivalent incomes below the subsistence minimum is largely due to the increase in the minimum wage. This finding underscores the potential impact of policy changes on income differentiation. In order to assess the differentiation of the standard of living of the population, a triple grouping by the size of the total equivalent incomes is carried out. It is proved that about 1/3 of the population receives monetary income at the level of the minimum wage. According to calculations, the proportion of households with average Cash income at the level of the minimum wage (up to 2.0 subsistence minimums) in 2019 was 37.6% and 2021 — 31.4%, respectively. The share of households that form the so-called “middle class” is insignificant. At the same time, the share of incomes that exceed five times the subsistence minimum per household is growing. Practical significance. The presented calculations indicate an increase in the differentiation of economic development, which requires active state intervention in the processes of distribution and formation of incomes of the population.

Keywords: strategy, inclusion, inclusive development, income differentiation, incomes of the population, economic growth.

Rеferences

  1. Gryshova, I. and Kyzym, M., Khaustova, V., Korneev, V., Kramarev, H. (2020). «Assessment of the Industrial Structure and its Infl uence on Sustainable Economic Development and Quality of Life of the Population of Diff erent World Countries». No. 12, 2072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052072.
  2. Gutorov, A. O. (2019). Inkliuzyvnyj rozvytok ekonomiky i ahrarnoi sfery (teoriia, metodyka, analiz). [ Inclusive development of the economy and agricultural sector (theory, methodology, analysis)]. Tochka. Kh Ukraine.
  3. Bobux, I. M., Kindzerskyj, Yu. V., Fashhevska, O. M. (2020). Strukturni zminy iak osnova inkliuzyvnoho rozvytku ekonomiky Ukrainy. [Structural changes as the basis for the inclusive development of the Ukrainian economy: monograph]; In Bobux, I. M. (). DU «Insty`tut ekonomiky` ta prognozuvannya NAN Ukrayiny». Кyiv. Ukraine.
  4. Inkliuzyvna ekonomika: teoriia ta praktyka. [Inclusive economy: theory and practice: monograph]. (2021). In Baldzhy, M. D. (). FOP Gulyayeva V. M. Кyiv. Ukraine.
  5. Zynchuk, T. O., Usyuk, T. V., Dankevych, V. Ye. (2017). Inkliuzyvnyj rozvytok sil’s’koi ekonomiky v umovakh hlobalizatsijnykh vyklykiv. [Inclusive development of the rural economy in the minds of globalization movements: monograph]. In Zinchuk, T. O., Kuczmus. N. M. Centr uchbovoyi literatury. Кyiv. Ukraine.
  6. Kozhyna, A. V. (2020). Publichne upravlinnia inkliuzyvnym mistsevym rozvytkom: teoriia, metodolohiia, praktyka. [Public management of inclusive community development: theory, methodology, practice]. Kam’ianets’-Podil’s’kyj. Ukraine.
  7. Kindzers’kyj, Yu. V. (2021). «Inclusive industrialization for steel development: before the ambush of theory and molding policy». Finansy Ukrainy. 5, pp. 3–39.
  8. Didux, S. M., Lobocz`ka, L. L., Minina, V. O. (2020). «An inclusive economy is a new paradigm for modern development». Ukrains’kyj zhurnal prykladnoi ekonomiky. 3. Volume 5, pp. 100‑107.
  9. Tkalich, T. (2018). «Inclusive economy as a model of world economic growth». Naukovyj visnyk NMU imeni V. O. Sukhomlyns’koho. Ekonomichni nauky. 1 (10), pp. 93-98.
  10. Opal`ko, V. V. (2019). «Socio-economic inequality and the formation of a new paradigm of inclusive development in Ukraine». Prychornomors’ki ekonomichni studii. Issue 38-2, pp. 63-69.
  11. Peresada, O. V. and Batig, V. V., Petrenko, D. A. (2023). «Key aspects of developing an inclusive model for managing business development». Enerhozberezhennia, enerhetyka, enerhoaudyt. 12 (190), pp. 85–107.
  12. Acemoglu D., Restrepo P. (2019). «Automation and new tasks: how technology displaces and reinstates labor». NBER National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working paper series. Working Paper 25684. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w25684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w25684.
  13. Vytraty na personal sub’iektiv velykoho, seredn’oho, maloho ta mikropidpryiemnytstva za vydamy ekonomichnoi diial’nosti u 2018-2022 rokakh. [Personnel costs of subjects of large, medium, small and micro enterprises by types of economic activity in 2018-2022]. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. [State Statistics Service of Ukraine]. Available at: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua.
  14. Obsiah realizovanoi produktsii (tovariv, posluh) pidpryiemstv za vydamy ekonomichnoi diial’nosti z rozpodilom na velyki, seredni, mali ta mikropidpryiemstva u 2018-2022 rokakh. [The volume of sold products (goods, services) of enterprises by types of economic activity, with a breakdown into large, medium, small and micro enterprises in 2018‑2022]. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. [State Statistics Service of Ukraine]. Available at: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua.
  15. Hroshovi vytraty domohospodarstv zalezhno vid rozmiru seredn’odushovykh ekvivalentnykh zahal’nykh dokhodiv za 2019-2021 roky. [Cash expenses of households depending on the amount of average per capita equivalent total income for 2019-2021]. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. [State Statistics Service of Ukraine]. Available at: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua.
  16. Stepanenko, S. (2023). «Methodological dominants of formation and development of inclusive economy». Naukovo-vyrobnychyj zhurnal «Biznes navihator». Issue 3 (73),94-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/business-navigator.73-16.
  17. Stepanenko, S. (2023). «Theoretical and conceptual basis of inclusive development of the economy». Naukovyj zhurnal «Naukovyj pohliad: ekonomika ta upravlinnia». Issue 3 (83), pp. 56-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2521-666X/2023-83-8.

The article was received 10.04.2024