УДК 338.24:330.34:330.342.14(477)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2024-4-30

Kozlova Valeria,
postgraduate student of the Faculty of Economics,
Lviv University of Trade and Economics
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3735-0448

JEL classification: C82, D81, E69, O11

The article is devoted to the formation of a practical methodology for assessing the impact of innovative and transformed macroeconomic solutions on the possibilities of innovative shifts in the economy of Ukraine. The multi-criteria analysis of the macroeconomic impact was carried out using regression analysis, the design of which most fully covers the metrics adopted in international comparisons. Regression coefficients were determined by the least squares method, and non-homogeneous data were normalized. The orientation of the innovative transformation of management decisions of the Government of Ukraine in the pre-war period is analyzed; their goal is defined as the creation of conditions for dynamic, inclusive growth and structural modernization of the economy. Weaknesses in the management decision-making system regarding the development of innovation potential at the macro level were identified by analyzing Ukraine’s rating according to the Global Innovation Index. The structural dynamics of transformations of macroeconomic decisions are analyzed according to indicators of Ukraine’s economic freedom level. Ukraine’s innovative development dynamics were analyzed based on officially published statistical data. There is a strong relationship between the innovative transformation of macroeconomic management decisions and the innovative activity of Ukrainian enterprises and the growth of the share of expenditures on scientific research and development in GDP, an unstable relationship between changes in macroeconomic regulation and the innovative activity of Ukrainian enterprises, and a weak relationship between changes in macroeconomic conditions and patent activity. The proposed analysis model makes it possible to identify the positive and negative effects of macroeconomic regulation on the dynamics of innovative shifts in the economy of Ukraine, so it can be recommended as a tool for diagnosing the quality of innovative transformations of managerial decision-making at the macro level. It is advisable to conduct further explorations to determine managerial influences on the possibility of effectively implementing innovative tools for the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine’s economy.

Keywords: macroeconomic influence; management decisions; structural modernization of the economy; innovative potential; post-war reconstruction of the economy.

Rеferences

  1. Bochulia, T. V. (2019). Innovatsiine pidhruntia informatsiino-analitychnoi transformatsii suchasnoho biznesu [Innovative basis for the information-analytical transformation of modern business]. Ekonomichna stratehiia i perspektyvy rozvytku sfery torhivli ta poslug, 2(30), 18–34.
  2. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy [State Statistics Service of Ukraine]. https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua
  3. Ekonomika Ukrainy / Ministerstvo finansiv Ukrainy [Economy of Ukraine / Ministry of Finance of Ukraine]. Available at: https://index.minfin.com.ua/ua/economy/
  4. Kvetnyi, R. N., Boiko, O. R., & Stepova, T. O. (2011). Bahatovymirna polinomial’na aproksymatsiia zalezhnostei zadanikh masyvamy interval’nykh danykh za metodym naimenshykh kvadrativ [Multidimensional polynomial approximation of dependencies given by arrays of interval data using the least squares method]. Visnyk Vinnits’koho politekhnichnoho instytutu, 3, 103-106.
  5. Kobela-Zvir, M. Ya. (2023). Grantova pidtrymka dlia predstavnykiv biznesu u formi konsaltynhu [Grant support for business representatives in the form of consulting]. Upravlinnia zminamy ta innovatsii, 7, 68–73.
  6. Ministerstvo ekonomiky Ukrainy [Ministry of Economy of Ukraine]. Arkhiv Proiektiv YeS z harmoniizatsii publichnykh zakupivel [EU Projects Archive on Public Procurement Harmonization]. Available at: https://me.gov.ua/Documents/MoreDetails?lang=uk-UA&id=30d2df64-6582-439d-8345-ee230b98862c&title=ArkhivProektivsZGarmonizatsiiPublichnikhZakupivel
  7. Ospanova, N. (n.d.). Chynnyky vplyvu na innovatsiinyi rozvytok krain [Factors influencing the innovative development of countries]. Available at: https://razumkov.org.ua/statti/chynnyky-vplyvu-na-innovatsiinyi-rozvytok-krain
  8. Pro skhvalennia Stratehii rozvytku sfery innovatsiinoi diial’nosti na perіod do 2030 roku: Rozporyadzhennia KMU [On approval of the Strategy for the Development of the Innovation Sector until 2030: Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine]. Document 526-2019-r from 10.07.2019. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/526-2019-%D1%80#Text
  9. Reforms v Ukraini 2016-2019: Nezvorotnist’ zmin / KMU [Reforms in Ukraine 2016-2019: Irreversibility of Changes]. Available at: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/storage/app/sites/1/reform%20office/ukraine-reform-conference-2019-09-ukr.pdf
  10. Intelektual’na vlasnist’ u tsyfrakh [Intellectual property in figures]. Kyiv, 2024. Available at: https://ukrpatent.org/atachs/IP-in-Figures-2023-web1-.pdf
  11. Basile, A., & Faraci, R. (2015). Aligning management model and business model in the management innovation perspective: The role of managerial dynamic capabilities in the organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-10-2013-0199
  12. Bouncken, R. B., Kraus, S., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2021). Knowledge- and innovation-based business models for future growth: Digitalized business models and portfolio considerations. Review of Managerial Science, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00366-z
  13. Bousdekis, A., Lepenioti, K., Apostolou, D., & Mentzas, G. (2021). A review of data-driven decision-making methods for Industry 4.0 maintenance applications. Electronics, 10(7), 828. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10070828
  14. Dickel, D. G., & de Moura, G. L. (2016). Organizational performance evaluation in intangible criteria: A model based on knowledge management and innovation management. RAI revista de administração e inovação, 13(3), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2016.06.005
  15. Index of Economic Freedom – 2024 / The Heritage Foundation. Available at: https://www.heritage.org/index/pages/all-country-scores
  16. Maaravi, Y., Heller, B., Shoham, Y., & Deutsch, B. (2021). Ideation in the digital age: Literature review and integrative model for electronic brainstorming. Review of Managerial Science, 15, 1431–1464. 10.1007/s11846-020-00400-5
  17. Nummela, N., Saarenketo, S., & Jokela, P. (2014). Strategic decision-making of a born global: A comparative study from three small open economies. Management International Review, 54, 527–550. 10.1007/s11575-014-0211-x
  18. O’Sullivan, J. (2014). The new apparatus of influence: Material modernism in the digital age. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 8(2), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.3366/ijhac.2014.0131
  19. The Global Innovation Index (2015-2024) / WIPO. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/portal/en/index.html

The article was received 28.10.2024