УДК 658.1/5

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2020-2-9

Andriy PYLYPENKO
Doctor of Science (Economics), Professor, Head of the Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics Accounting and Business Consulting Department

JEL classification: G34; Q01

Abstract
Introduction. In terms of the ISO 22301 requirements about ensuring the enterprise continuity under the increasing external environment variability, it is necessary to form control contours for maintaining the reorganization sustainability of corporate enterprises and their integrated associations.
The purpose of scientific research is to develop theoretical and methodological bases for ensuring the sustainability of the reorganization of the activities of integrated associations of corporate enterprises.
Results. The corporate architecture concept usage to ensure the sustainability of the enterprise activities reorganization has been proposed. The connection between the enterprise activities reorganization, its reorganization as a legal entity, and the redistribution of corporate control have been determined. The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF), the architectural modeling language Archimate, and the OMG Essence standard (the kernel and Language for Software Engineering Methods) have been used as the research’s methodological basis. The author’s approach specific distinction is the program of enterprise activities reorganization subordination to the vision of key stakeholders about the list of practices used to create consumer value. The possibility of maintaining the stability reorganization of the enterprise and its activities by using the concept of successful organizational transformations has been reflected. The practical significance of the developed technology of the reorganization sustainability is laid in providing business entities the tools for matching critical elements of the current and future enterprise’s business model. This matching gives to the enterprise management possibility to develop the organizational transformation program.
Conclusions. The proposed technology of enterprise reorganization sustainability ensuring is focused on creating a successful socio-economic system and based on taking into account the interests of main stakeholders. However, the presented technology reveals only a higher level of corporate enterprise activity organization. Therefore, the prospects for further author’s research consist of detailing particular enterprise architecture elements and forming a model basis for their coordinated development.
Keywords: the enterprise activity reorganization, corporate enterprise, integrated association of enterprises, enterprise architecture, and corporate control.

References
1. Gohan, P.A. (2010). Slijaiija, pogloshhenija i restrukturizacija kompaiij. [Mergers, acquisitions and restructuring of companie]. Al’pina Pablisherz. Moskow. Russia.
2. Grigor’ev, L.Ju. (2017). Korporativnaja arhitektura i ee sostavljajushhie. [Corporate architecture and its components]. Available at: http://bigc.ru/theory/innovations/corp_arch.php.
3. Grosul, V.A. (2007). Socіal’no-ekonomіchna stіjkіst’ pіdpriєmstva: teoretiko-metodologіchnі zasadi ta praktichnij іnstrumentarіj. [Socio-economic stability of the enterprise: theoretical and methodological principles and practical tools]. HDUHT. Kharkiv. Ukraine.
4. Depamfilis, D. (2007). Slijanija, pogloshhenija i drugie sposoby restrukturizacii kompanii. [Mergers, acquisitions and other ways to restructure a company]. Olimp-Biznes. Moskow. Russia.
5. Kadyev, T. (2004). Sintez processov i ih organizacija. [Synthesis of processes and their organization]. Available at: https://www.businessstudio.ru/articles/sintez_protsessov_i_ikh_organizatsiya/.
6. Kuc, L.L. (2012). Strategіchna stіjkіst’ pіdpriєmstva. [Strategic stability of the enterprise]. TNEU. Ternopіl. Ukraine.
7. Kuchin, B.L., Jakusheva, E.V. (1990). Upravlenie razvitiem jekonomicheskih sistem: tehnicheskij progress, ustojchivost’. [Management of the development of economic systems: technical progress, sustainability]. Jekonomika. Moskow. Russia.
8. Levenchuk, A.I. (2018). Sistemnoe myshlenie. [Systems thinking]. Izdatel’skie reshenija. Moskow. Russia.
9. Mazur, I.I., Shapiro, V.D. (2000). Restrukturizacija predprijatij i kompanij. Spravochnoe posobie dlja specialistov i predprinimatelej. [Restructuring of enterprises and companies. A reference book for professionals and entrepreneurs]. Vysshaja shkola. Moskow. Russia.
10. Prigozhin, A.I. (2007). Dezorganizacija: Prichiny, vidy, preodolenie. [Disorganization: Reasons, types, overcoming]. Al’pina Biznes Buks. Moskow. Russia.
11. Sіshhuk, L.V. (2015). «Reorganization of legal entities: theoretical and legal aspects». Privatne pravo і pіdpriєmnictvo. no 14, pp. 32-36.
12. Suharev, M.S. (2011). «Model for assessing the functional stability of business processes». Vestnik KGU im. N.A. Nekrasova. no 5-6. pp. 4-6.
13. Ugol’nickij, G.A. (2016) Upravlenie ustojchivym razvitiem aktivnyh sistem. [Management of sustainable development of active systems]. Izdatel’stvo Juzhnogo federal’nogo universiteta. Rostov. Russia.
14. Civіl’nij kodeks Ukraї ni. [The Civil Code of Ukraine]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text.
15. Jachmen’ova, V.M. (2010). Stіjkіst’ dіjal’nostі promislovih pіdpriєmstv. [Sustainability of industrial enterprises]. ARIAL. Sіmferopol. Ukraine.
16. Business Architecture Body of Knowledge (BIZBOK) Available at: http://www.businessarchitectureguild.org/Documents/Final.pdf.
17. Essence – Kernel and Language for Software Engineering Methods Available at: https://www.omg.org/spec/Essence/1.2/PDF.
18. ISO 22301:2019. Security and resilience – Business continuity management systems – Requirements. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/75106.html.
19. The Archi modelling toolkit. Available at: https://www.archimatetool.com/.
20. The ArchiMate 3.1 Specification. Available at: http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate3-doc/toc.html.
21. Gharajedaghi, J. (2011). Systems thinking: managing chaos and complexity: a platform for designing business architecture. Morgan Kaufmann. USA.
22. Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK). Available at: https://www.sebokwiki.org/w/images/sebokwiki-farm!w/8/8d/SEBoKv1.4_full.pdf.
23. Lankhorst, M. (2017). Enterprise Architecture at Work. Modelling, Communication and Analysis. Springer. New York. USA
24. The TOGAF Standard. Version 9.2. The Open Group. USA.
25. Wierda, G. (2017). Mastering ArchiMate. Instruction to the ArchiMate enterprise architecture modeling language. R&A. The Netherlands.

The article was received 25.02.2020